The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce?
Abstract
The author considers that the profound antagonism between political economy and cultural studies can be overcome provided cultural studies stop accusing political economy of economism and reductionism. He nevertheless calls for researchers in cultural studies to better take into consideration economic determinations in their theorization of power in relation to culture, and not to be too quick to reject possibilities of false consciousness of individuals faced with the cultural and media productions on offer. In this text, still deeply steeped in the traditional Marxist model, the author finally considers the place granted to race and gender relations in structures of domination, by defending the primacy of social class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments: Editorial
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12019 · Cited by 757
Fuchs, C. (2012) · tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/triplec.v10i2.443 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandy, O. H., & Garnham, N.
- Venue
- Critical Studies in Mass Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-71
- ISSN
- 0739-3180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976567635
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 106.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15295039509366919
- The paper
- Gandy, O. H., & Garnham, N. (1995). Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce? Critical Studies in Mass Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039509366919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.