Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce?

Gandy, Oscar H., Garnham, Nicholas·1995·Critical Studies in Mass Communication

Abstract

The author considers that the profound antagonism between political economy and cultural studies can be overcome provided cultural studies stop accusing political economy of economism and reductionism. He nevertheless calls for researchers in cultural studies to better take into consideration economic determinations in their theorization of power in relation to culture, and not to be too quick to reject possibilities of false consciousness of individuals faced with the cultural and media productions on offer. In this text, still deeply steeped in the traditional Marxist model, the author finally considers the place granted to race and gender relations in structures of domination, by defending the primacy of social class.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15295039509366919

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Gandy, O. H., & Garnham, N.
Venue
Critical Studies in Mass Communication
Published
1995-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
60-71
ISSN
0739-3180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976567635
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
106.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15295039509366919
The paper
Gandy, O. H., & Garnham, N. (1995). Political economy and cultural studies: Reconciliation or divorce? Critical Studies in Mass Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039509366919

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.