The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments: Editorial
Abstract
Why “mediatization” as a topic for communication theory now? This rather ungainly word has been rising in prominence for the past decade, but many readers of this journal may still want to ask: What does it mean? What does it add to communications theory? And is it necessary at all? The purpose of this introduction to the special issue—apart from introducing and summarizing the articles that follow—is to provide some context for the emergence of “mediatization” as a key theoretical concept for contemporary media and communications research, and to offer some reasons why it now deserves the full attention of scholars of communication theory. The word “mediatization” does indeed strike an odd note to the ears of native English speakers, provoking the immediate reaction: Why is such an awkward formulation needed? But we are long past the point in communications research when the instincts of native English speakers should have priority! A fully institutionalized field of communications research has a pressing need for common terms that can orientate researchers from many countries and geolinguistic regions toward shared problems and areas of inquiry. As Sonia Livingstone (2009) explained in her ICA Presidential address in Montreal in 2008, “mediatization”—or in German: Mediatisierung—is a term with a long and respectable history in German-speaking countries. More important, it has emerged as the most likely “winner” in a race between many terms, all cumbersome or ambiguous to varying degrees—mediazation, medialization, mediation—that have been coined to capture somehow the broad consequences for everyday life and practical organization (social, political, cultural, economic) of media, and more particularly of the pervasive spread of media contents and platforms through all types of context and practice. Put simply, something is going on with media in our lives, and it is deep enough not to be reached simply by accumulating more and more specific studies that analyze this newspaper, describe how that program was produced, or trace how particular audiences make sense of that film on a particular occasion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
The theory of communicative action
(2014) · The Philosophy of Habermas · doi:10.4324/9781315710495-5 · Cited by 8,634
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge
Gustafson, J. M., Berger, P. L., Luckmann, T., & Luckmann, T. (1968) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1385127 · Cited by 4,311
What is Wrong with Social Theory?
Blumer, H. (1954) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088165 · Cited by 2,535
Schrift, A. D. (2013) · A Companion to Foucault · doi:10.1002/9781118324905.ch5 · Cited by 2,108
"Mediatization" of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?
MAZZOLENI, G., & SCHULZ, W. (1999) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/105846099198613 · Cited by 1,483
THOMAS, N. (1991) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674044326 · Cited by 1,339
Silverstone, R. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203358948 · Cited by 1,210
What Is Wrong with Social Theory?
Blumer, H. (2017) · Sociological Methods · doi:10.4324/9781315129945-8 · Cited by 1,180
The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change
Hjarvard, S. (2008) · Nordicom Review · doi:10.1515/nor-2017-0181 · Cited by 1,128
Cited by
Mediatization: key concept or conceptual bandwagon?
Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443714542218 · Cited by 279
Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.149 · Cited by 258
Artificial intelligence in digital media: the era of deepfakes
Karnouskos, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2020.3001312 · Cited by 239
The Theory of Hypermediation: Anti-Gender Christian Groups and Digital Religion
Evolvi, G. (2022) · Journal of Media and Religion · doi:10.1080/15348423.2022.2059302 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Couldry, N., & Hepp, A.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-202
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160619691
- Cited by
- 757
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 119.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments: Editorial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/comt.12019
- The paper
- Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments: Editorial. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.