CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 208Eating Disorders and BehaviorsRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Racial Minorities Respond in the Same Way to Mainstream Beauty Standards? Social Comparison Processes in Asian, Black, and White Women

CHIN EVANS, PEGGY, McCONNELL, ALLEN R.·2003·Self and Identity
DOI 10.1080/15298860309030
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Some members of stigmatized groups, such as Asian women, may be more likely to experience negative self-evaluations after exposure to a mainstream beauty standard than members of other stigmatized groups, such as Black women. In this study, 54 Asian women, 52 Black women, and 64 White women, were exposed to mainstream standards of beauty and compared themselves to these idealized images. It was hypothesized that although Black women would find these comparisons irrelevant, Asian women would see these targets as relevant for their comparisons, reflecting their striving for mainstream beauty standards. The results indicated that Black women did not find mainstream standards as relevant to themselves, and reported positive self-evaluations generally and about their bodies in particular. Asian women, on the other hand, responded differently than Black women and were more likely to endorse mainstream beauty standards in a similar fashion to White women. As predicted, Asian women also experienced greater dissatisfaction with their bodies than did Black women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15298860309030

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chen J., 1993, A Magazine: The Image Issue, 2, 15
  2. Fiske A. P., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 2, 915
  3. Okazawa-Rey M., 1986, Women's Studies Quarterly, 14, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
CHIN EVANS, P., & McCONNELL, A. R.
Affiliations
Miami University (US)
ORCID
McCONNELL, ALLEN R.
Venue
Self and Identity
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-04
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
153-167
ISSN
  • 1529-8868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8876
DOI
10.1080/15298860309030
OpenAlex
W2067547825
Cited by
208
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Self and Identity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
beauty standards, racial minorities, social comparison, Asian women, Black women, white women, body dissatisfaction, self-assessment, stigmatized groups, ethnic differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review