The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of Bisexuality in America
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
In this article the authors use data from the 2002 and 2006 to 2008 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) to analyze the most recent patterns of bisexuality in the United States. There has been little demographic work done on the issue of bisexuality, and this article strives to explore some aspects of this sexual orientation. Using a social constructionist definition of sexuality, the authors enumerate those who identify, desire, and behave as bisexual as well as compare some basic demographic characteristics of bisexuality with heterosexuality, homosexuality, and asexuality. Overall, the authors find that conclusions about the prevalence of bisexuality and the characteristics of bisexual individuals versus other sexualities do differ depending on the dimension employed. Most generally, however, the authors find that bisexual respondents are more likely to be in poorer health condition than heterosexual respondents (but in better health compared to gay and lesbian respondents), more likely to be engaged in full time employment, and less likely to have ever been married.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These disjunctures have been shown to change research results, depending on the measure of sexual orientation used.
“and these disjunctures have been shown to change research results, depending on the measure of sexual orientation used (Bostwick et al. 2010; Compton et al. 2015; Korchmaros et al. 2013; Mize 2016).”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Compton et al. 2015
The finding that more men and women report same-sex sexual experience or same-sex attraction than report gay or bisexual identity is consistent with past research.
“The finding that more men and women report same-sex sexual experience or same-sex attraction than report gay or bisexual identity is consistent with past research”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Compton et al. 2015
Previous studies show differences in findings based on the measure of sexual orientation used.
“After all, previous studies show differences in findings based on the measure of sexual orientation used.”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Compton et al. 2015
There has been increasing interest among social scientists to explore and analyze sexual identities and measures that exist on the borders of heterosexuality and homosexuality, such as queer, asexual, pansexual, fluid, or heteroflexible.
“there has been increasing interest among social scientists to explore and analyze sexual identities and measures that exist on the borders of heterosexuality and homosexuality, such as queer, asexual, pansexual, fluid, or heteroflexible (Bridges 2014; Callis 2014; Compton et al. 2015; Savin-Williams and Vrangalova 2013; Silva 2016; Ward 2008).”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Compton et al. 2015
If using a behavior dimension of sexual orientation, bisexual men self-report as significantly less healthy compared to straight men.
“Compton et al. (2015) find that, if using a behavior dimension of sexual orientation, bisexual men self-report as significantly less healthy compared to straight men”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Compton et al. 2015
There are no significant differences in self-reported health between bisexual men and straight men when using an attraction or identity measure of sexual orientation.
“however, they find no significant differences in self-reported health between bisexual men and straight men when using an attraction or identity measure of sexual orientation.”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Compton et al. 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1080/15299716.2014.986597 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1533-8525.1996.tb00748.x · DOI
- 10.1111/jomf.12076 · DOI
- Baumle A.K., 2009, Same sex partners: The demography of sexual orientation, 10.1515/9780791477489 · DOI
- 10.2307/2648117 · DOI
- 10.1080/00224490409552235 · DOI
- Butler J., 1990, Gender trouble
- 10.1177/1363460713511094 · DOI · Paper page
- Diamond L.M., 2009, Sexual fluidity: Understanding women's love and desire
- 10.1300/J159v01n02_05 · DOI
- Foucault M., 1978, The history of sexuality: An introduction, Vol. 1
- 10.1080/15299716.2014.933466 · DOI
- 10.1080/15299716.2014.929553 · DOI
- Gates G., 2011, How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender?
- Gates G.J., 2004, The gay and lesbian atlas
- Human Rights Campaign., 2001, Gay and lesbian families in the United States: Same-sex unmarried partner households
- 10.1300/J159v04n01_09 · DOI
- Janus S.S., 1993, The Janus report on sexual behavior
- Kinsey A.C., 1948, Sexual behavior in the human male
- Laumann E.O., 1994, The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States
- National Center for Health Statistics, 2004, National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6, 2002
- Ochs R., 1996, Bisexuality: The identity and politics of an invisible minority, 217
- 10.1080/15299716.2011.571983. · DOI
- 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.18 · DOI
- Rust P.C. R., 2000, Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader, 129
- 10.1300/J159v01n01_04 · DOI
- Schilt K., 2015, TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2, 10.1215/23289252-2848895 · DOI
- Seidman S., 1996, Queer theory/sociology, 1
- Sexual Minority Assessment Research Team (SMART), 2009, Best practices for asking questions about sexual orientation on surveys
- 10.1080/00224490409552228 · DOI
- 10.1177/1363460708091742 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10508-011-9767-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mishel, E. (2019) · Journal of Official Statistics · doi:10.2478/jos-2019-0036 · Cited by 64
“As another example, Compton et al. (2015) find that, if using a behavior dimension of sexual orientation, bisexual men self-report as significantly less healthy compared to straight men; however, they find no significant differences in self-reported health between bisexual men and straight men when…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Compton, D. R., Farris, D. N., & Chang, Y.-T.
- Affiliations
- LSU New Orleans (US)
- University of West Alabama (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Compton, D’Lane R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bisexuality
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-10-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481-497
- ISSN
- 1529-9716 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-9724
- OpenAlex
- W2228541053
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Bisexuality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- bisexuality, sexual orientation, bisexual identity, bisexual behavior, health status, employment, marriage, heterosexuality, homosexuality, asexuality, social construction of sexuality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review