Cited by 43Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Beyond Criterion A1: The Effects of Relational and Non-Relational Traumatic Events

Anders, Samantha L., Shallcross, Sandra L., Frazier, Patricia A.·2012·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

Trauma research has historically focused on Criterion A1 traumas, neglecting many other negative interpersonal events that have been shown to lead to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; S. L. Anders, P. A. Frazier, & S. Frankfurt, 2011 ). Trauma research has also focused primarily on PTSD and neglected other important outcomes, such as relationship functioning. This study aimed to assess a broader range of events, including many Criterion A1 interpersonal events; assess the cumulative impact of event exposure; and examine the relation between event exposure and a broad range of outcomes, including relationship functioning. A sample of 181 undergraduate students completed measures assessing exposure to a broad range of events, their worst lifetime event, and current psychological (e.g., psychological distress) and relationship (e.g., partner trust) functioning. Results suggested that non-Criterion A1 relational events were very common in our sample. The number of lifetime relational events experienced, whether Criterion A1 or non-Criterion A1, was strongly and consistently associated with all outcomes. The number of lifetime Criterion A1 non-relational events experienced was significantly associated with current PTSD symptoms but was not associated with other mental health and relationship outcomes. No differences were found between Criterion A1 relational, non-Criterion A1 relational, and Criterion A1 non-relational worst events on any of the mental health or relationship me…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2012.642744

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distinctions between relational and non-relational SLEs and economic SLEs have been used in some previous studies.

    “Distinctions between relational and non-relational SLEs and economic SLEs have been used in some previous studies (Anders, Shallcross, & Frazier, 2012; Stone et al., 2015; Ward, Kanu, & Robb, 2017).”

    From Stressful life events increase the risk of major depressive episodes: A population-based twin study (2023) · cites this paper as Anders, Shallcross, & Frazier, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Anders, S. L., Shallcross, S. L., & Frazier, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Anders, Samantha L.
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2012-02-29
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
134-151
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2089525408
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, interpersonal trauma, relationship functioning, partner trust, psychological distress, undergraduate students, mental health outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Male, Mass Screening, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Prevalence, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review