Cited by 20Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Early traumatized inpatients high in psychoform and somatoform dissociation: Characteristics and treatment response

Jepsen, Ellen K. K., Langeland, Willie, Heir, Trond·2014·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

This study examined the clinical relevance of differences in psychoform and somatoform dissociative symptoms in 55 early traumatized inpatients. The high psychoform and somatoform dissociative group (n = 18), somatoform dissociative group (n = 22), and nondissociative group (n = 15) did not differ on abuse severity, depressive symptoms, interpersonal problems, Axis I or II comorbidity, or deterioration rates. Compared to the other 2 groups, the highly dissociative group was characterized by younger age, living alone, higher levels of posttraumatic and general distress, more frequent reports of suicidality, self-mutilation, eating problems, and less favorable treatment response. The results highlight the clinical relevance of using dissociation measures for identifying subgroups of patients with severe psychopathology who may be more treatment resistant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2014.924461

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of standard psychodynamic psychotherapy for DID on core dissociative symptoms are small or absent.

    “The results indicated that, although the general functioning of patients improved, the effects of this treatment on the core symptoms (i.e., dissociative symptoms) are small or absent.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jepsen, E. K. K., Langeland, W., & Heir, T.
Affiliations
  • Modum Bad – Gordon Johnsens stiftelse (NO)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Jepsen, Ellen K. K.
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2014-09-30
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
572-587
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2087423033
Cited by
20
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
dissociation, somatoform dissociation, childhood trauma, treatment resistance, suicidality, self-mutilation, eating disorders, posttraumatic distress
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Agoraphobia, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Major Depressive Disorder, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Norway, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Somatoform Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Self-Injurious Behavior, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review