Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 22Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential Diagnosis between Anomalous Experiences and Dissociation Disorder Using the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS)

Vencio, Sérgio, Caiado-Vencio, Rafael, Caixeta, Leonardo·2019·Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

Background It is important to understand the most diverse cultural aspects related to religiosity. Scientifically, it is important to understand religious manifestations and their relation to health, and to differentiate them from psychopathological manifestations. Objective To evaluate the mental health of a group of mediums and compare it with that of a control group from the same religious context who do not manifest mediumship, using the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS). Methods This was a cross-sectional study, evaluating 47 mediums (Group 1) and comparing them with 22 non-medium volunteers from the same religious context (Group 2) using the DDIS questionnaire. All results were matched with historical data from patients with dissociative identity disorder (DID) who answered the DDIS. Results Scores obtained from the DDIS were similar in both groups. The number of positive symptoms was comparable in a wide range of analyzed areas, involving but not being restricted to somatization disorder, major depressive episode, borderline personality disorder, extrasensory/paranormal experiences, physical/sexual abuse and five dissociative disorders. There were considerable differences when we compared these results with historical data from patients with DID. Conclusion In agreement with the extant literature, these results showed that mediumship can be considered a non-pathological form of dissociative phenomena.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15299732.2018.1502715

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

1 more claim about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. American Psychiatry Association (APA), 2013, (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
  2. 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.07.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000123 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/jssr.2004.43.issue-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.899 · DOI
  6. 10.2466/pr0.1986.58.1.191 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000694 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3109/10826084.2016.1155224 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31826b6dle · DOI
  10. IBGE, 2010, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico
  11. Koenig H. G., 2015, Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 29, 19
  12. Krippner S., 1997, Broken images, broken selves: Dissociative narratives in clinical practice, 3
  13. 10.1016/j.explore.2008.12.003 · DOI
  14. Marcusson-Clavertz D., 2011, The Journal of Parapsychology, 75
  15. 10.1016/S0193-953X(18)30300-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/jcn.2011.20.issue-23-24 · DOI
  17. 10.1176/ajp.147.12.1698-b · DOI
  18. Ross C. A., 1992, Dissociation, 5, 87
  19. 10.1080/15299732.2016.1172538 · DOI
  20. 10.2466/pr0.96.2.445-453 · DOI
  21. 10.1590/S1516-44462006005000039 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s13644-011-0007-4 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000251 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.071 · DOI
  25. Spitzer C., 2006, World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 5, 82
  26. World Health Organization (WHO), 1992, The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines

Cited by

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Vencio, S., Caiado-Vencio, R., & Caixeta, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
  • School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
Corresponding author
Vencio, Sérgio
Venue
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Published
2018-07-30
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
165-178
ISSN
  • 1529-9732 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-9740
OpenAlex
W2885557732
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
mediumship, dissociative disorders, dissociative identity disorder, anomalous experiences, extrasensory perception, paranormal experiences, somatization disorder, borderline personality disorder, major depressive episode, religious experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Diagnosis, Differential, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Psychology, Spiritualism, Substance-Related Disorders, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Diagnosis between Anomalous Experiences and Dissociation Disorder Using the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15299732.2018.1502715
The paper
Vencio, S., Caiado-Vencio, R., & Caixeta, L. (2019). Differential Diagnosis between Anomalous Experiences and Dissociation Disorder Using the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule (DDIS). Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1502715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.