Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Performance Measurement System Design as Link Between Strategy Formulation and Performance Information Use in Public Sector Organizations

Johnsen, Åge, Solholm, Kerstin, Tufte, Per Arne·2024·Public Performance & Management Review

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15309576.2024.2360158

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1108/IJPSM-06-2015-0114 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/977630 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.x · DOI
  4. 10.1093/jopart/muz036 · DOI
  5. Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. (2012). Strategic management and public service performance. Palgrave MacMillan. · DOI
  6. Askim, J. (2004). Performance management and organizational intelligence: Adapting the balanced scorecard in Larvik municipality. International Public Management Journal, 7(3), 415–438.
  7. 10.1177/0020852307081152 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/10967490802649395 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/jopart/mum012 · DOI
  10. 10.4337/9781800371200.00042 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/1540-6210.00322 · DOI
  13. Bryson, J. M. (2015). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Elsevier.
  14. 10.1080/10967490902873473 · DOI
  15. Bryson, J. M., & George, B. (2020). Strategic management in public administration. In B. Guy Peters & Ian Thynne (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia, politics. Oxford University Press.
  16. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2103173 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8 · DOI
  18. Daleq B. & Hobbel M. A. (2014). Spredning av balansert målstyring i norske kommuner. [The diffusion of balanced scorecard in Norwegian municipalities] [Master Thesis in Business Administration]. Handelshøyskolen i Trondheim.
  19. de Bruijn, H. (2007). Managing performance in the public sector (2nd Edition). Routledge. · DOI
  20. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. Reprinted in revised edition in W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). University of Chicago Press.
  21. 10.1111/puar.13036 · DOI
  22. Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage. · DOI
  23. 10.2307/974736 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/973394 · DOI
  25. Ferlie, E., & Ongaro, E. (2022). Strategic management in public services organizations: Concepts, schools and contemporary issues (2nd edition). Routledge. · DOI
  26. Frederickson, D. G., & Frederickson, H. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Georgetown University Press.
  27. 10.1177/0734371X17698189 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/padm.12390 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/puar.13104 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/puar.12433 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/15309576.2022.2045615 · DOI
  32. Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th edition). Cengage.
  33. 10.1177/02750740211048891 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0095399711417701 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2116091 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/15309576.2002.11643671 · DOI
  37. Henseler, J. (2021). Composite-based structural equation modeling: Analyzing latent and emergent variables. Guilford Press.
  38. Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. K. (2015). ADANCO 2.0. Composite Modeling. Kleve, Germany: Composite Modeling.
  39. 10.1093/jopart/muy017 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00564.x · DOI
  41. 10.1080/10967494.2014.997906 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0275074016676574 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/1468-0408.t01-1-00073 · DOI
  44. 10.1108/02686900110395460 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2012.00539.x · DOI
  46. 10.1111/1467-9477.12077 · DOI
  47. Joyce, P., & Drumaux, A. (Eds.) (2014). Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives. Routledge. · DOI
  48. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
  49. 10.1080/14719037.2019.1599059 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02648.x · DOI
  51. 10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/0275074013486180 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/15309576.2016.1071159 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/puar.12331 · DOI
  55. 10.1177/0020852310372050 · DOI
  56. 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00402.x · DOI
  57. 10.3390/socsci8050152 · DOI
  58. Meld. St. 12. (2011–2012). Stat og kommune – styring og samspel [Government and municipality – governance and interplay]. Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development.
  59. 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1111/padm.12382 · DOI
  61. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
  62. Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
  63. Moynihan, D. P., & Lavertu, S. (2016). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02539.x · DOI
  64. 10.1111/padm.12050 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/14719037.2018.1508609 · DOI
  66. 10.1006/mare.1999.0115 · DOI
  67. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00429.x · DOI
  69. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x · DOI
  70. 10.2753/PMR1530-9576360405 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/14719037.2016.1203013 · DOI
  72. 10.1177/1356389006064191 · DOI
  73. Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.) (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  74. 10.1016/0305-0483(82)90064-0 · DOI
  75. Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, Complexity, and democratic values. Georgetown University Press.
  76. 10.1080/15309576.2022.2118798 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00403.x · DOI
  78. 10.1080/15309576.2022.2062014 · DOI
  79. Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford University Press.
  80. 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02008.x · DOI
  81. 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00387.x · DOI
  82. 10.1086/257839 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1080/14719037.2022.2103172 · DOI
  84. 10.1080/1471903042000303319 · DOI
  85. van Helden, G. J., & Johnsen, Å. (2002). A comparative analysis of the development of performance-based management systems in Dutch and Norwegian local government. International Public Management Journal, 5(1), 75–95.
  86. van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2016). Commonalities and differences in public and private sector performance management practices: A literature review. In: M. J. Epstein, F. Verbeeten, & S. K. Widener (Eds.), Performance measurement and management control: Contemporary issues (Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, Volume 31, pp. 309–351). Emerald. · DOI
  87. 10.2307/3380482 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/puar.12920 · DOI
  89. 10.2307/977173 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Johnsen, Å., Solholm, K., & Tufte, P. A.
Venue
Public Performance & Management Review
Published
2024-06-04
Pages
1-36
ISSN
  • 1530-9576
  • 1557-9271
Cited by
32
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review