Cited by 28,308Management and Organizational StudiesEconomic Theory and InstitutionsWeber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony

Meyer, John W., Rowan, Brian·1977·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

Many formal organizational structures arise as reflections of rationalized institutional rules. The elaboration of such rules in modern states and societies accounts in part for the expansion and increased complexity of formal organizational structures. Institutional rules function as myths which organizations incorporate, gaining legitimacy, resources, stability, and enhanced survival prospects. Organizations whose structures become isomorphic with the myths of the institutional environment-in contrast with those primarily structured by the demands of technical production and exchange-decrease internal coordination and control in order to maintain legitimacy. Structures are decoupled from each other and from ongoing activities. In place of coordination, inspection, and evaluation, a logic of confidence and good faith is employed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/226550

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ceremonial value of certifications occurs only when they become taken for granted as legitimate, apart from evaluations of their impact on work outcomes.

    “The ceremonial value of certifications occurs only when they become ''. . .taken for granted as legitimate, apart from evaluations of their impact on work outcomes''”

    From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Meyer and Rowan, 1977

  • Once institutionalized, the prevalence of a practice in leading organizations is taken to be proof that it must be effective.

    “Once institutionalized, the prevalence of a practice in leading organizations is taken to be proof that it must be effective (Meyer and Rowan, 1977).”

    From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Meyer and Rowan, 1977

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B.
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1977-09
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
340-363
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W1965278510
Cited by
28,308
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1998 · 2025: 1387 · 2024: 1338 · 2023: 1300 · 2022: 1317 · 2021: 1325 · 2020: 1311 · 2019: 1305 · 2018: 1256 · 2017: 1201 · 2016: 1176 · 2015: 1216 · 2014: 1202 · 2013: 1142 · 2012: 1120
FWCI
24.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Keywords
formal structure, institutional rules, organizational myths, organizational legitimacy, isomorphism, organizational survival, internal coordination, organizational control, good faith, rationalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review