Cited by 10Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringCommunity Development and Social ImpactAccounting and Organizational Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Revenue Diversification Really Improve Mission Performance? Evidence from a Sample of Human Service Nonprofits

Hung, ChiaKo, Tsai, Chin-Chang, Wu, Wei-Ning·2024·Public Performance & Management Review

Abstract

While our understanding of the relationships between revenue diversification and nonprofit financial health has deepened over the past three decades, little is known about the association between revenue diversification and nonprofit mission performance. Moreover, there is an ongoing debate as to whether revenue diversification hinders or improves nonprofit performance. Some expect performance improvement from diversification strategies, while others contend that concentration strategies drive performance. This study aims to fill this research gap by investigating the effect of revenue diversification on nonprofit managers’ perceived mission performance. Using data from a sample of Taiwan’s human service nonprofits collected in 2020, we estimate relationships with regressions, employing a more detailed measure of organizational performance and various revenue diversification measurements. The results suggest that revenue diversification is positively associated with nonprofit managers’ perceived mission performance. This study further discusses theoretical contributions to the literature and practical implications for human service nonprofit organizations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15309576.2024.2382443

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hsu, J. C. (2004). Differences and similiarities between community development and community empowerment in Taiwan. Community Development Quarterly, 107, 22–31. [in Chinese].
  2. Hwang, Y.-S., Liu, S.-J., Chuang, L.-H., & Lin, X.-T. (2010). The relationship between community social capital and community development. Journal of Public Administration, 34, 29–75. [in Chinese].
  3. 10.2307/2975974 · DOI
  4. W.K. Kellogg Foundation (2004). WK Kellogg foundation logic model development guide. W.K. Kellogg Foundation.
  5. Wang, S.-T. (2007). The resources mobilization and integration in nonprofit organization: The study of community development association. Taiwanese Journal of Social Welfare, 5(2), 103–137. [in Chinese]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hung, C., Tsai, C.-C., & Wu, W.-N.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Chin-Chang
Venue
Public Performance & Management Review
Published
2024-07-27
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1512-1534
ISSN
  • 1530-9576 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9271
OpenAlex
W4401049252
Cited by
5
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Performance & Management Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
College of Management, National Sun Yat-sen University (CMNSYSU-SRS-2022-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Organizational Management
Keywords
income diversification, nonprofit financial health, organizational performance, perceived performance, nonprofit management, focus strategy, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review