Cited by 130Heavy metals in environmentArsenic contamination and mitigationEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Contamination of Floodplain Soils along the Wupper River, Germany, with As, Co, Cu, Ni, Sb, and Zn and the Impact of Pre-definite Redox Variations on the Mobility of These Elements

Frohne, Tina, Rinklebe, Jörg, Diaz-Bone, Roland A.·2014·Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal

Abstract

This study demonstrates that floodplain soils of the River Wupper, Germany, are seriously contaminated with metal(loid)s. We used an automated biogeochemical microcosm system allowing controlled variation of redox potential (EH) to assess the impact of pre-definite redox conditions on the dynamics of arsenic (As), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), antimony (Sb), and zinc (Zn) in homogenized soil material taken from an acid floodplain soil. The concentrations of Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Sb, and Zn in soil solution were low at low EH, possibly due to the precipitation of metal sulfides, and increased with rising EH, presumably caused by their association with dissolved organic carbon (DOC). A significant positive correlation between metal/DOC-ratio and EH indicated that the binding of the metals to DOC shifted from stronger to weaker when EH rose. Decreasing As concentrations with increasing EH in soil solution indicated co-precipitation with Fe(hydr)oxides and/or oxidation of more soluble As(III) to less soluble As(V) during oxidation. The other studied elements seemed not to co-precipitate with newly formed Fe(hydr)oxides when EH rose, possibly due to the prevailing low pH. In the future, the specific role of DOC and sulfur chemistry on metal(loid) dynamics should be elucidated more fully, and similar studies should be conducted with additional frequently flooded soils worldwide to verify these results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15320383.2014.872597

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frohne, T., Rinklebe, J., & Diaz-Bone, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Venue
Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal
Published
2014-03-05
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
779-799
ISSN
  • 1532-0383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7887
OpenAlex
W2068097732
Cited by
130
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
floodplain soils, metal(loid) contamination, redox potential, arsenic, cobalt, copper, nickel, antimony, zinc, dissolved organic carbon, metal sulfide precipitation, arsenic oxidation, metal mobility, Wupper River

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review