Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Quantitative Nitroblue Tetrazolium Assay for Determining Intracellular Superoxide Anion Production in Phagocytic Cells

Sim Choi, Hyung, Woo Kim, Jun, Cha, Young‐Nam, Kim, Chaekyun·2006·Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry

Abstract

Conventionally, a semi-quantitative microscopic nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) assay is used to determine the production of superoxide anion (O2(-)) in various phagocytic cells. This microscopic assay is conducted by counting the cells containing blue NBT formazan deposits, which are formed by reduction of the membrane permeable, water-soluble, yellow-colored, nitroblue tetrazolium (Y-NBT) by O2(-). However, this assay is semi-quantitative and is prone to observer bias. In the present study, we modified the NBT assay by dissolving the blue formazan particles using 2M potassium hydroxide and dimethylsulfoxide and then measured its absorbance using a microplate reader at 620nm. The absorbance of dissolved NBT increased in proportion to cell number (r = 0.9907), incubation time, and stimulus concentration. To test the usefulness of this modified assay, we compared the abilities of a number of types of phagocytic cells to produce O2(-). The cells examined included murine macrophage cell lines (RAW 264.7 and J774), freshly prepared murine peritoneal macrophages and neutrophils, a human myeloid cell line (PLB-985), and freshly prepared human peripheral blood neutrophils. In addition, we demonstrate that nitric oxide produced by RAW 264.7 cells does not interfere with the modified colorimetric NBT assay. Taken together, our results indicate that the modified colorimetric NBT assay is simple, sensitive, and quantitative, and that it can be used to determine the amounts of intracellular O2(-) produced by phagocytic cells. Thus, this assay is sensitive enough to measure, quantitatively, even the small amounts of O2(-) produced in monocytes and macrophages that are not detectable by the conventional microscopic NBT assay.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15321810500403722

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Sim Choi, H., Woo Kim, J., Cha, Y., & Kim, C.
Venue
Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry
Published
2006-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
31-44
ISSN
  • 1532-1819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4230
OpenAlex
W2034969930
Cited by
484
References
23
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Quantitative Nitroblue Tetrazolium Assay for Determining Intracellular Superoxide Anion Production in Phagocytic Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15321810500403722
The paper
Sim Choi, H., Woo Kim, J., Cha, Y., & Kim, C. (2006). A Quantitative Nitroblue Tetrazolium Assay for Determining Intracellular Superoxide Anion Production in Phagocytic Cells. Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/15321810500403722

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.