Cited by 56Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth, Education, and Aging

Successful Elements of Intergenerational Dementia Programs: A Scoping Review: Research

Open access
Gerritzen, E V, Hull, M J, Verbeek, H, Smith, A E, de Boer, B·2020·Journal of Intergenerational Relationships

Abstract

People with dementia often experience social isolation and stigmatization. Research shows that bringing generations together can be mutually beneficial. Although intergenerational dementia programs show promising results, specific successful elements remain unclear. A scoping literature review was performed to compare intergenerational dementia programs and identify successful elements and outcomes. Successful elements included (1) including buddy systems to foster relationship building, (2) dementia education to increase knowledge, positive attitudes and empathy among younger participants, (3) Montessori-based activities, (4) being considerate about activity set-up, (5) analyzing student-reflective journals, and (6) reminiscence programs. These findings can be used to develop successful intergenerational dementia programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15350770.2019.1670770

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice (Trade ed.) . Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  2. Covidence (2018) [systematic review software]. Veritas health innovation . Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from www.covidence.org
  3. Giglio, L. L. (2006). Effect of a music therapy intergenerational program on cued and spontaneous behaviors of older adults with dementia. UMI Dissertation Services . ProQuest Information and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerritzen, E. V., Hull, M. J., Verbeek, H., Smith, A. E., & de Boer, B.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht, Netherlands
Corresponding author
Gerritzen, E V
Venue
Journal of Intergenerational Relationships
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
214-245
ISSN
  • 1535-0770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-0932
OpenAlex
W2978887258
Cited by
56
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Intergenerational Relationships (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health, Education, and Aging
Keywords
intergenerational programs, dementia, social isolation, stigma, buddy system, dementia education, Montessori activities, reminiscence, reflective journals, program design, intergenerational relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review