The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The unremarked optimum: whiteness, optimization, and control in the database revolution
Abstract
The 1970s saw major transformations in how computerized databases were conceived, developed, and designed. Part of a broader shift in how software applications were developed, these transformations—sometimes referred to as “the database revolution”—introduced new and then-novel approaches to structuring and arranging digital data, optimizing them for usability and convenience. At the same time, however, the rhetoric of innovation and revolution surrounding this moment in database development obscures the ways it helped concentrate and extend particular kinds of racialized power and, in particular, whiteness (i.e., those norms and values congenial to the reproduction of white racial dominance and the subjugation of blackness). In this article, we revisit key works of the database revolution to show how they encoded whiteness as a kind of unremarked optimum, in both implicit and explicit ways. Finally, we argue that these developments helped to codify and extend a kind of “willful ignorance” that, as scholars of epistemology and justice have shown, is central to the preservation and reproduction of whiteness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anti-Racist HCI: notes on an emerging critical technical practice
Abebe, V., Amaryan, G., Beshai, M., Ilene, Gurgen, A. E., Ho, W., Hylton, N. R., Kim, D., Lee, C., Lewandowski, C., et al. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3516382 · Cited by 26
Alharbi, R., Brewer, R. N., & Schoenebeck, S. Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555570 · Cited by 34
Bentley, C., Muyoya, C., Vannini, S., Oman, S., & Jiménez, A. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231203667 · Cited by 23
Grill, G. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zekqv · Cited by 15
Constructing Capabilities: The Politics of Testing Infrastructures for Generative AI
Grill, G. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659009 · Cited by 18
Knowledge and Digital Technology
Glückler, J., & Panitz, R. (2024) · Knowledge and space · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39101-9 · Cited by 11
Library Curriculum as Epistemic Justice
Campbell, H., & Sich, D. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.40964 · Cited by 8
Bock, F., & Pfenninger, S. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104229 · Cited by 9
Racial-Genomic Interest Convergence and the Geneticization of Black Families
Peters, C. (2023) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2023.2228315 · Cited by 6
Data-Based Frictions in Civic Action: Trust, Technology, and Participation
Powell, A. B. (2024) · Knowledge and space · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39101-9_9 · Cited by 2
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-009
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-007
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-002
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-003
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-008
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-006
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-004
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-005
(2024) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9781478059233-001
Data Science and the Post-Liberal Arts University
Liu, A. (2025) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/735621
Synthetic Data: Representation and/vs Representativeness
Devinney, H., Harrison, K., Gautam, V., & Shklovski, I. (2025) · Decennial Aarhus Conference · doi:10.1145/3737609.3747095
Unremarking on Whiteness: The Midcentury Feminism of Erma Bombeck’s Humor and Rhetoric
White-Farnham, J. (2023) · Peitho. · doi:10.37514/pei-j.2023.25.2.02
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, N., Hoffmann, A. L., & Florini, S.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoffmann, Anna Lauren
- Venue
- Review of Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-04-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-128
- ISSN
- 1535-8593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3174774282
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › History of Computing Technologies
- Keywords
- whiteness, optimization, control, racial dominance, Blackness, willful ignorance, database design, computerized database
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
