Cited by 30Human Resource and Talent ManagementEducational Leadership and PracticesEducation, Leadership, and Health Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preparing for Leadership Turnover in Christian Higher Education: Best Practices in Succession Planning

Barton, Andrew·2019·Christian Higher Education

Abstract

In the face of unprecedented disruption and complexity, the higher education sector appears to be largely underprepared for the projected exodus of senior-level administrators due to retirements and briefer tenures in leadership roles. Given that religiously affiliated institutions account for more than one in five colleges and universities in the United States, it is concerning that relatively few studies have addressed succession planning in this sector, and in Christ-centered higher education in particular. This article provides a review of the literature that has addressed the topic of succession planning and discusses the findings from a single-institution ethnographic case study that explored the culture of succession planning and leader development at Lipscomb University in Nashville, Tennessee. The conceptual framework used in this study was developed through the dissertation research of C. L. Richards in 2009, and is referred to as the 5Cs Model: Strategies for Succession Planning in the Academy. Through a grounded theory study, Richards suggested five strategies leaders should consider as they approach succession planning in academic institutions: culture, champions, communication, competency-based, and continuous. The article then discusses succession planning as an effective process that presidents, boards, and senior leaders can use to intentionally develop a cadre of future leaders, highlighting the unique challenges and best practice opportunities of pursuing this strategy, and recommends several implications for practice in Christian higher education.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15363759.2018.1554353

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Andringa R. C, 2009, Turnaround: Leading stressed colleges and universities to excellence, 168
  2. 10.1177/1523422308322277 · DOI
  3. Berger L., 2017, The talent management handbook: Creating a sustainable competitive advantage by selecting, developing, and promoting the best people
  4. Berke D, 2005, Succession planning and management: A guide to organizational systems and practices
  5. Bernthal P., 2006, Human Resource Planning, 29, 31
  6. Bornstein R, 2010, Succession planning for the higher education presidency
  7. Charan R, 2005, Harvard Business Review, 83, 72
  8. Cohn J. M., 2005, Harvard Business Review, 83, 62
  9. Conger J. A., 2003, Harvard Business Review, 81, 76
  10. Dockery D. S, 2008, Renewing minds: Serving church and society through Christian higher education
  11. Gangone L. M., 2014, Women and leadership in higher education, 3
  12. 10.1002/hrm.20216 · DOI
  13. Gunsalus C. K, 2006, The college administrator’s survival guide, 10.4159/9780674065550 · DOI
  14. Hedge J. W., 2002, Implementing organizational interventions: Steps, processes, and best practice
  15. Hoffman R., 2014, The alliance: Managing talent in the networked age
  16. 10.1080/15363759.2016.1107348 · DOI
  17. Kesler G. C, 2002, Human Resource Planning, 25, 32
  18. 10.1177/1548051813483836 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/15363759.2016.1107339 · DOI
  20. Lovett C, 2017, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64, 13
  21. 10.1080/10668921003723144 · DOI
  22. Luna G, 2012, International Leadership Journal, 4, 56
  23. McKenna D. L, 2014, The succession principle: How leaders make leaders
  24. Menjares P, 2017, Diversity matters: Race, ethnicity, & the future of Christian higher education
  25. Page S, 2007, The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies
  26. Phillippe K, 2016, AACC CEO Survey: Compensation
  27. 10.1080/15363759.2016.1107340 · DOI
  28. Rosse J., 2003, Academic administrator’s guide to hiring.
  29. Rothwell W. J, 2010, Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within
  30. Selingo J. J, 2013, College (un)bound: The future of higher education and what it means for students
  31. Slaughter S., 2004, Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education, 10.56021/9780801879494 · DOI
  32. Song W. H., 2012, A study of presidents of independent colleges and universities
  33. Sonnenfeld J. A, 1988, The hero's farewell: What happens when CEOs retire
  34. Stripling J, 2011, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58, 1
  35. Wallin D., 2005, Community College Journal, 76, 24
  36. Williams D. A, 2017, A matter of excellence: A guide to strategic diversity leadership and accountability in higher education

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barton, A.
Affiliations
Azusa Pacific University (US)
Corresponding author
Barton, Andrew
Venue
Christian Higher Education
Published
2019-01
Volume
18
Issue
1-2
Pages
37-53
ISSN
  • 1536-3759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4107
OpenAlex
W2911905823
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Christian Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education, Leadership, and Health Research
Keywords
succession planning, leadership turnover, leader development, institutional culture, competency-based leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review