The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preparing for Leadership Turnover in Christian Higher Education: Best Practices in Succession Planning
Abstract
In the face of unprecedented disruption and complexity, the higher education sector appears to be largely underprepared for the projected exodus of senior-level administrators due to retirements and briefer tenures in leadership roles. Given that religiously affiliated institutions account for more than one in five colleges and universities in the United States, it is concerning that relatively few studies have addressed succession planning in this sector, and in Christ-centered higher education in particular. This article provides a review of the literature that has addressed the topic of succession planning and discusses the findings from a single-institution ethnographic case study that explored the culture of succession planning and leader development at Lipscomb University in Nashville, Tennessee. The conceptual framework used in this study was developed through the dissertation research of C. L. Richards in 2009, and is referred to as the 5Cs Model: Strategies for Succession Planning in the Academy. Through a grounded theory study, Richards suggested five strategies leaders should consider as they approach succession planning in academic institutions: culture, champions, communication, competency-based, and continuous. The article then discusses succession planning as an effective process that presidents, boards, and senior leaders can use to intentionally develop a cadre of future leaders, highlighting the unique challenges and best practice opportunities of pursuing this strategy, and recommends several implications for practice in Christian higher education.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, competency based succession planning is to align to organisational goals and identify people based on specific competencies that will help institutions be more strategic and deliberate in their planning (Barton, 2019).”
From A Review on Competency-Based Succession Planning at Higher Education Institution in Malaysia (2021) · cites this paper as Barton, 2019
In the citing paper
“This is due to the complex landscape, resulting in a higher frequency of senior level administrators in higher education retiring or deciding to leave their posts (Barton, 2019; Claybourne et al., 2020).”
From A Review on Competency-Based Succession Planning at Higher Education Institution in Malaysia (2021) · cites this paper as Barton, 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Andringa R. C, 2009, Turnaround: Leading stressed colleges and universities to excellence, 168
- 10.1177/1523422308322277 · DOI
- Berger L., 2017, The talent management handbook: Creating a sustainable competitive advantage by selecting, developing, and promoting the best people
- Berke D, 2005, Succession planning and management: A guide to organizational systems and practices
- Bernthal P., 2006, Human Resource Planning, 29, 31
- Bornstein R, 2010, Succession planning for the higher education presidency
- Charan R, 2005, Harvard Business Review, 83, 72
- Cohn J. M., 2005, Harvard Business Review, 83, 62
- Conger J. A., 2003, Harvard Business Review, 81, 76
- Dockery D. S, 2008, Renewing minds: Serving church and society through Christian higher education
- Gangone L. M., 2014, Women and leadership in higher education, 3
- 10.1002/hrm.20216 · DOI
- Gunsalus C. K, 2006, The college administrator’s survival guide, 10.4159/9780674065550 · DOI
- Hedge J. W., 2002, Implementing organizational interventions: Steps, processes, and best practice
- Hoffman R., 2014, The alliance: Managing talent in the networked age
- 10.1080/15363759.2016.1107348 · DOI
- Kesler G. C, 2002, Human Resource Planning, 25, 32
- 10.1177/1548051813483836 · DOI
- 10.1080/15363759.2016.1107339 · DOI
- Lovett C, 2017, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 64, 13
- 10.1080/10668921003723144 · DOI
- Luna G, 2012, International Leadership Journal, 4, 56
- McKenna D. L, 2014, The succession principle: How leaders make leaders
- Menjares P, 2017, Diversity matters: Race, ethnicity, & the future of Christian higher education
- Page S, 2007, The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies
- Phillippe K, 2016, AACC CEO Survey: Compensation
- 10.1080/15363759.2016.1107340 · DOI
- Rosse J., 2003, Academic administrator’s guide to hiring.
- Rothwell W. J, 2010, Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within
- Selingo J. J, 2013, College (un)bound: The future of higher education and what it means for students
- Slaughter S., 2004, Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education, 10.56021/9780801879494 · DOI
- Song W. H., 2012, A study of presidents of independent colleges and universities
- Sonnenfeld J. A, 1988, The hero's farewell: What happens when CEOs retire
- Stripling J, 2011, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58, 1
- Wallin D., 2005, Community College Journal, 76, 24
- Williams D. A, 2017, A matter of excellence: A guide to strategic diversity leadership and accountability in higher education
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review on Competency-Based Succession Planning at Higher Education Institution in Malaysia
Ghazali, M. T., Abdul Rahman, S. A., & Abd. Ghani, M. (2021) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/11120 · Cited by 11
“This is due to the complex landscape, resulting in a higher frequency of senior level administrators in higher education retiring or deciding to leave their posts (Barton, 2019; Claybourne et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, A.
- Affiliations
- Azusa Pacific University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barton, Andrew
- Venue
- Christian Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 37-53
- ISSN
- 1536-3759 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-4107
- OpenAlex
- W2911905823
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Christian Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Education, Leadership, and Health Research
- Keywords
- succession planning, leadership turnover, leader development, institutional culture, competency-based leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review