The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability and Validity of the Youth Version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART–Y) in the Assessment of Risk-Taking Behavior Among Inner-City Adolescents
Abstract
This study examined the reliability and validity of the youth version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART-Y) for assessing adolescent risk behaviors among a sample of 98 inner-city African American adolescents (M age = 14.8, SD = 1.5). In addition to a relation with sensation seeking, BART-Y responding evidenced a significant relation with a composite of risk behaviors across substance use, sexual behavior, delinquency, and health domains. BART-Y responding also explained unique variance in a composite of these risk behaviors above and beyond demographic variables and risk-related personality constructs, including sensation seeking and impulsivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults
Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90011-x · Cited by 1,163 · cited 1×
“Internal consistency for the subscale is good (α = .84; Eysenck et al., 1985) and is consistent across male and female participants.”
BackgroundAlbarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856 · Cited by 792 · cited 1×
“Prevention efforts have shown the efficacy of targeting behavioral skills as well as attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge regarding risk behavior ( Albarracin, Gillette, & Earl, 2005 ), yetsuch efforts rarelytarget the construct of disinhibition.”
BackgroundEvaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents
Aklin, W. M., Lejuez, C. W., Zvolensky, M. J., Kahler, C. W., & Gwadz, M. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.007 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Braams, B. R., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Peper, J. S., & Crone, E. A. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4764-14.2015 · Cited by 617
Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience
Schonberg, T., Fox, C. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.002 · Cited by 330
Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the balloon analogue risk task.
Lighthall, N. R., Mather, M., & Gorlick, M. A. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006002 · Cited by 300
Lejuez, C. W., Magidson, J. F., Mitchell, S. H., Sinha, R., Stevens, M. C., & De Wit, H. (2010) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01217.x · Cited by 293
Self-citationMacPherson, L., Magidson, J. F., Reynolds, E. K., Kahler, C. W., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01223.x · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W., Daughters, S., Zvolensky, M., Kahler, C., & Gwadz, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 106-111
- ISSN
- 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-4424
- OpenAlex
- W2080568748
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability and Validity of the Youth Version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART–Y) in the Assessment of Risk-Taking Behavior Among Inner-City Adolescents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15374410709336573
- The paper
- Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W., Daughters, S., Zvolensky, M., Kahler, C., & Gwadz, M. (2007). Reliability and Validity of the Youth Version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART–Y) in the Assessment of Risk-Taking Behavior Among Inner-City Adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410709336573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
