Cited by 48Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentMedia Influence and HealthDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Why Superman Can Wait: Cognitive Self-Transformation in the Delay of Gratification Paradigm

Karniol, Rachel, Galili, Lior, Shtilerman, Dafna, Naim, Reut, Stern, Karin, Manjoch, Hadar, Silverman, Rotem·2011·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

We examined middle-class Israeli preschoolers' cognitive self-transformation in the delay of gratification paradigm. In Study 1, 66 un-caped or Superman-caped preschoolers delayed gratification, half with instructions regarding Superman's delay-relevant qualities. Caped children delayed longer, especially when instructed regarding Superman's qualities. In Study 2 with 43 preschoolers, with the respective relevant superhero qualities emphasized (i.e., patient vs. impulsive), Superman-caped children tended to delay longer than Dash-caped children. In Study 3, 48 preschoolers delayed gratification after being instructed to pretend to be Superman or a child with the same patient qualities, or after watching a video of Superman, with or without pretend instructions. Invoking Superman led to longer delays and instructions regarding Superman's qualities tended to lead to longer delays than watching the Superman video. In accounting for the data, we differentiated cognitive transformations of the reward's consummatory value and cognitive transformations as basic intellectual processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2011.546040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children's performance on laboratory self-control tasks can be boosted by situational intervention.

    “For example, the finding that children's performance on laboratory self-control tasks can be boosted by situational intervention (e.g., Karniol et al. 2011) seems to clash with the finding that childhood variation on such self-control measures predicts health, wealth, employment, and crime decades later (Moffitt et al. 2011).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Karniol et al. 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 48

Authors
Karniol, R., Galili, L., Shtilerman, D., Naim, R., Stern, K., Manjoch, H., & Silverman, R.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Karniol, Rachel
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2011-02-28
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
307-317
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2000518749
Cited by
48
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
delay of gratification, Superman, superheroes, preschool children, self-control, pretend play, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Imagination, Impulsive Behavior, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review