Cited by 251Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment Sequencing for Childhood ADHD: A Multiple-Randomization Study of Adaptive Medication and Behavioral Interventions

Open access

Abstract

Behavioral and pharmacological treatments for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were evaluated to address whether endpoint outcomes are better depending on which treatment is initiated first and, in case of insufficient response to initial treatment, whether increasing dose of initial treatment or adding the other treatment modality is superior. Children with ADHD (ages 5-12, N = 146, 76% male) were treated for 1 school year. Children were randomized to initiate treatment with low doses of either (a) behavioral parent training (8 group sessions) and brief teacher consultation to establish a Daily Report Card or (b) extended-release methylphenidate (equivalent to .15 mg/kg/dose bid). After 8 weeks or at later monthly intervals as necessary, insufficient responders were rerandomized to secondary interventions that either increased the dose/intensity of the initial treatment or added the other treatment modality, with adaptive adjustments monthly as needed to these secondary treatments. The group beginning with behavioral treatment displayed significantly lower rates of observed classroom rule violations (the primary outcome) at study endpoint and tended to have fewer out-of-class disciplinary events. Further, adding medication secondary to initial behavior modification resulted in better outcomes on the primary outcomes and parent/teacher ratings of oppositional behavior than adding behavior modification to initial medication. Normalization rates on teacher and parent ratings were generally high. Parents who began treatment with behavioral parent training had substantially better attendance than those assigned to receive training following medication. Beginning treatment with behavioral intervention produced better outcomes overall than beginning treatment with medication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2015.1105138

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1111/jcpp.2000.41.issue-3 · DOI
  2. Cunningham C. E., 1998, The community parent education (COPE) program: A school-based family systems oriented course for parents of children with disruptive behavior disorders
  3. Gresham F. M., 1989, Social skills rating system: Parent, teacher, and child forms
  4. Pelham W. E., 2015, Behavioral, pharmacological, and combined treatment for ADHD: A dose-ranging, between groups analysis
  5. 10.1002/sim.v30.4 · DOI
  6. 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.5.753 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–250 of 250

Metadata

Authors
Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Greiner, A. R., Gnagy, E. M., Pelham, W. E., Coxe, S., Verley, J., Bhatia, I., Hart, K., Karch, K., Konijnendijk, E., Tresco, K., Nahum-Shani, I., & Murphy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
396-415
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2276801646
Cited by
251
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 10
FWCI
26.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - PCOM (Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH069614, MH069434, MH092466, MH53554, MH065899, MH62988)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA11873)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA12414, DA12986)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R324B060045, R324J060024, LO30000665A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, treatment sequencing, behavioral parent training, extended-release methylphenidate, treatment response, student discipline, oppositional behavior, medication adherence, children
MeSH terms
School Teachers, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Parents, Referral and Consultation, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review