Cited by 12Additive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesCellular and Composite Structures

Residual stress and deformation analysis of lattice compressor impeller based on 3D printing simulation

Zhang, Yuan, Li, Fanchun, Jia, Dejun·2022·Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures

Abstract

Based on the octagonal truss, a new lightweight lattice impeller (L-impeller) is designed. The 3D printing process of the design impeller is simulated by Finite Element Method (FEM). The machinability and simulation feasibility of the design impeller are verified by SLM280 Metal 3D printer. The printing process of L-impeller and solid impeller (S-impeller) under different power is analyzed and compared. The results show the maximum residual deformation of L-impeller is 20.19% smaller than that of S-impeller, and the maximum residual stress is 10.69% smaller than that of L-impeller, which means that the L-impeller will have better printing performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15376494.2020.1789926

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Ti-6Al-4V lattice impellers, residual stress is lower than in solid ones, with a reduction in the maximum residual stress by 8.72%.

    “In the case of Ti-6Al-4V applied to impellers, research indicates that residual deformation can be reduced by 20.19% compared to solid compressor impellers, and the residual stress in lattice impellers is lower than in solid ones, with a reduction in the maximum residual stress by 8.72% [71,72].”
  • For Ti-6Al-4V applied to impellers, residual deformation can be reduced by 20.19% compared to solid compressor impellers.

    “In the case of Ti-6Al-4V applied to impellers, research indicates that residual deformation can be reduced by 20.19% compared to solid compressor impellers, and the residual stress in lattice impellers is lower than in solid ones, with a reduction in the maximum residual stress by 8.72% [71,72].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Li, F., & Jia, D.
Affiliations
Dalian Maritime University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Fanchun
Venue
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures
Published
2020-07-11
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
717-731
ISSN
  • 1537-6494 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6532
OpenAlex
W3041486662
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
Keywords
compressor impeller, residual stress, residual deformation, laser powder bed fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review