The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Silico Tools for Sharing Data and Knowledge on Toxicity and Metabolism: Derek for Windows, Meteor, and Vitic
Abstract
ABSTRACT Lhasa Limited is a not-for-profit organization that exists to promote the sharing of data and knowledge in chemistry and the life sciences. It has developed the software tools Derek for Windows, Meteor, and Vitic to facilitate such sharing. Derek for Windows and Meteor are knowledge-based expert systems that predict the toxicity and metabolism of a chemical, respectively. Vitic is a chemically intelligent toxicity database. An overview of each software system is provided along with examples of the sharing of data and knowledge in the context of their development. These examples include illustrations of (1) the use of data entry and editing tools for the sharing of data and knowledge within organizations; (2) the use of proprietary data to develop nonconfidential knowledge that can be shared between organizations; (3) the use of shared expert knowledge to refine predictions; (4) the sharing of proprietary data between organizations through the formation of data-sharing groups; and (5) the use of proprietary data to validate predictions. Sharing of chemical toxicity and metabolism data and knowledge in this way offers a number of benefits including the possibilities of faster scientific progress and reductions in the use of animals in testing. Maximizing the accessibility of data also becomes increasingly crucial as in silico systems move toward the prediction of more complex phenomena for which limited data are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer systems for the prediction of xenobiotic metabolism
Langowski, J., & Long, A. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00011-x · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Cited by
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling
Bowes, J., Brown, A. J., Hamon, J., Jarolimek, W., Sridhar, A., Waldron, G., & Whitebread, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3845 · Cited by 748
In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity
Raies, A. B., & Bajic, V. B. (2016) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1240 · Cited by 744
ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology
Richard, A. M., Judson, R. S., Houck, K. A., Grulke, C. M., Volarath, P., Thillainadarajah, I., Yang, C., Rathman, J., Martin, M. T., Wambaugh, J. F., et al. (2016) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00135 · Cited by 709
Djoumbou-Feunang, Y., Fiamoncini, J., Gil-de-la-Fuente, A., Greiner, R., Manach, C., & Wishart, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0324-5 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Marchant, C. A., Briggs, K. A., & Long, A.
- Venue
- Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 177-187
- ISSN
- 1537-6516 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6524
- OpenAlex
- W1995370815
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Silico Tools for Sharing Data and Knowledge on Toxicity and Metabolism: Derek for Windows, Meteor, and Vitic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15376510701857320
- The paper
- Marchant, C. A., Briggs, K. A., & Long, A. (2008). In Silico Tools for Sharing Data and Knowledge on Toxicity and Metabolism: Derek for Windows, Meteor, and Vitic. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376510701857320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
