Cited by 748Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAnimal testing and alternativesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling

Bowes, Joanne, Brown, Andrew J., Hamon, Jacques, Jarolimek, Wolfgang, Sridhar, Arun, Waldron, Gareth, Whitebread, Steven·2012·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

In vitro pharmacological profiling is increasingly being used earlier in the drug discovery process to identify undesirable off-target activity profiles that could hinder or halt the development of candidate drugs or even lead to market withdrawal if discovered after a drug is approved. Here, for the first time, the rationale, strategies and methodologies for in vitro pharmacological profiling at four major pharmaceutical companies (AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Pfizer) are presented and illustrated with examples of their impact on the drug discovery process. We hope that this will enable other companies and academic institutions to benefit from this knowledge and consider joining us in our collaborative knowledge sharing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd3845

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro pharmacological profiling implemented earlier in the drug discovery process helped to identify some predictable undesirable off-target activity profiles.

    “in vitro pharmacological profiling implemented earlier in the drug discovery process helped to identify some predictable undesirable off-target activity profiles, which would hinder drug candidate development or even lead to market withdrawal if discovered after drug approval3.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowes, J., Brown, A. J., Hamon, J., Jarolimek, W., Sridhar, A., Waldron, G., & Whitebread, S.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Italy) (IT)
  • Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Bowes, Joanne
  • Brown, Andrew J.
  • Hamon, Jacques
  • Jarolimek, Wolfgang
  • Sridhar, Arun
  • Waldron, Gareth
  • Whitebread, Steven
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2012-11-30
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
909-922
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2018453465
Cited by
748
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
off-target effects, drug attrition, drug safety
MeSH terms
Drug Industry, Risk Assessment, Drug Discovery, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review