Cited by 14Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The role of parental emotional validation and invalidation on children’s clinical symptoms: A study with children exposed to intimate partner violence

Ferrajão, Paulo Correia·2020·Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development

Abstract

Parental emotional validation has been proposed of as a major explanatory mechanism of the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and children’s psychological problems. The present study examined the effect of parental emotional validation and invalidation on the relationship between exposure to IPV, and both post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms. Sample was composed of Portuguese children exposed to IPV and an age- and gender-matched control group. Structural equation modeling was conducted. Children who were exposed to IPV presented higher scores on PTSD (p < .001, d = .99) and depression symptoms (p < .01, d = .63), and paternal (p < .05, d = .67) and maternal (p < .01, d = .81) emotional invalidation. Children who were exposed to IPV presented lower scores on paternal emotional validation (p < .001, d = 1.23). Exposure to IPV directly predicts both PTSD and depression symptoms but the indirect effect was stronger. Paternal emotional validation moderated the impact of exposure to IPV on clinical symptoms; the relationship between exposure to IPV and both PTSD and depression symptoms was mediated by maternal emotional invalidation. Findings suggest the potential usefulness of parental emotional validation and invalidation as treatment goals in clinical intervention with this population. Interventions to improve the therapist-patient alliance recommend that therapists use emotional validation. Training of emotional validation skills in parenting training may prevent the deleterious effects of exposure to IPV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15379418.2020.1731399

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrajão, P. C.
Affiliations
Universidade Europeia (PT)
Corresponding author
Ferrajão, Paulo Correia
Venue
Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development
Published
2020-01-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
4-20
ISSN
  • 2690-4586 (ISSN-L)
  • 2690-4594
OpenAlex
W3014608324
Cited by
14
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Trauma Child Custody & Child Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
intimate partner violence, children exposed to domestic violence, post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive symptoms, parent training, child psychological problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review