Cited by 11Educational Management and QualityEducational Assessment and ImprovementDecision Support System Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integrating a Decision Support System into a School: The Effects on Student Functioning

Kalay, Poria, Chen, David·2002·Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Abstract

Information systems have been developed and applied in schools throughout the world, yet there is a lack of professional literature devoted to an examination of the effects of these systems on administrative and other activities in the school. Systematic empirical research on this subject is needed not only for its inherent scientific value, but also to expand the knowledge base in this field, which may facilitate the application of the potential of computerized administration systems in schools, leading to more effective administration and management of schools. This study examined the effect on student functioning of integrating an information system into the school management’s decision-making process in planning the teaching and learning system. The results indicate a significant improvement in student achievement, particularly in difficult subjects such as mathematics and English. The improvement is not only in terms of statistical significance, but also in the dimensions and in a positive change in distribution, with a rise in the achievement and a significant decrease in the number of failures. In addition, the findings indicate reduced mobility of students from one level of study to another and a decline in the drop out rate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15391523.2002.10782360

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Alter S. L., 1980, Decision support systems: Current practice and continuing challenges.
  2. Benbasat I., 1984, The information systems research challenge, 47
  3. Bloom B. S., 1977, Human characteristics and school learning.
  4. Bozeman W., 1991, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 514, 10.1080/08886504.1991.10781979 · DOI
  5. Brimer M. A., 1978, Sources of differences in school achievement.
  6. Chen D., 1995, General system theory: Toward a conceptual framework for science and technology education for all
  7. Coleman J. S., 1966, Equality of educational opportunity.
  8. Cook T. D., 1979, Quasi-experimentation, design and analysis issues for field settings.
  9. Corno L., 1986, Handbook of research on teaching, 605
  10. Fullan M. G., 1988, Canadian Journal of Education, 13, 404, 10.2307/1494920 · DOI
  11. Glass G. V., 1976, Educational Researcher, 5, 3, 10.3102/0013189X005010003 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Glaser R., 1977, Adaptive education: Individual diversity and learning.
  13. Gutierrez R., 1992, Review of Educational Research, 62, 333, 10.3102/00346543062004333 · DOI
  14. Kalay P., 1995, Information technology in education management, 147, 10.1007/978-0-387-34839-1_20 · DOI
  15. Kivijarvi H., 1997, Decision Support Systems, 20, 215, 10.1016/S0167-9236(96)00069-3 · DOI
  16. Osin L., 1996, Review of Educational Research, 66, 621, 10.3102/00346543066004621 · DOI
  17. Pelgrum W. J., 1993, The IEA study of computers in education, implementation on innovation in 21 education systems.
  18. Richards C. E., 1989, Microcomputer application for strategic management in education: A case study approach.
  19. Rutter M., 1982, Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary school and their effects on children.
  20. Silver M. S., 1991, Systems that support decision makers.
  21. Snow R. E., 1986, American Psychologist, 41, 1029, 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1029 · DOI
  22. Stake R. E., 1978, Case studies in science education.
  23. Telem M., 1991, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23, 594, 10.1080/08886504.1991.10781985 · DOI
  24. Telem M., 1995, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 281, 10.1080/08886504.1995.10782133 · DOI
  25. Visscher A. J., 1995, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 231, 10.1080/08886504.1994.10782130 · DOI
  26. Zusovsky R., 1991, Schools classrooms and pupils, 25, 10.1016/B978-0-12-582910-6.50008-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kalay, P., & Chen, D.
Affiliations
  • Levinsky College of Education (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Published
2002-06
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
435-452
ISSN
  • 1539-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0818
OpenAlex
W2298428917
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research on Technology in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
Keywords
decision support system, school information system, school management, teaching and learning planning, academic performance, student failure, student mobility, school dropout, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review