Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Cognitive Tools to Represent Problems

Jonassen, David·2003·Journal of Research on Technology in Education
DOI 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The premise of this paper is that the key to problem solving is adequately representing the problem to be solved. Most research has focused on how problems are (re)presented to learners. The assumption that those external representations naturally map onto learners’ internal representations of problems has not been confirmed. New research has examined the role of tools for externalizing learners’ internal representations. Descriptions of how three kinds of cognitive tools—semantic networks, expert systems, and systems modeling tools—can be used to externalize learner’s internal representations are provided. Research is needed to study the efficacy of these tools for supporting problem solving.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Adams-Webber J., 1995, Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8, 237, 10.1080/10720539508410806 · DOI
  2. Anderson J. R., 1983, The architecture of cognition.
  3. Bodner G. M., 1986, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 727, 10.1002/tea.3660230807 · DOI
  4. Carroll J.M., 1980, British Journal of Psychology, 71, 143, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02740.x · DOI
  5. Chi M. T. H., 1991, Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 251
  6. Chi M. T. H., 1981, Cognitive Science, 5, 121, 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chipman S. F., 1985, Thinking and learning skills
  8. Cho K. L., 2002, Educational Technology: Research & Development, 50, 5
  9. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, 1992, Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice, 244
  10. de Jong T., 1991, Learning and Instruction, 1, 289, 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90010-6 · DOI
  11. Dunkle M. E., 1995, Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving.
  12. Fu X., 1995, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 261, 10.1080/09541449508402449 · DOI
  13. Gagne R.M., 1985, Conditions of learning
  14. Goldschmidt G., 1989, The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6, 204
  15. Hegarty M., 1995, Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 18, 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18 · Paper page
  16. Hong N. S., Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
  17. Jonassen D. H., 2000, Computers as Mindtools in schools: Engaging critical thinking.
  18. Jonassen D. H., 1993, Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge.
  19. Jonassen D. H., 1996, Computers as cognitive tools: Mindtools for critical thinking.
  20. Jonassen D. H., Educational Psychology Review.
  21. Jonassen D. H., 1999, Educational Technology, 39, 37
  22. Jonassen D. H, 2001, Educational Technology: Research and Development, 49, 35
  23. Jones D. R., 1995, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 214, 10.1006/obhd.1995.1017 · DOI
  24. Kitchner K. S., 1983, Human Development, 26, 222, 10.1159/000272885 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kleinmutz D. N., 1993, Psychological Science, 4, 221, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00265.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kotovsky K., 1989, Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon, 60
  27. Lamberti D. M., 1989, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 27, 10.1016/0020-7373(89)90031-X · DOI
  28. Larkin J. H., 1983, Mental models, 75
  29. Larkin J. H., 1985, Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2): Research and open questions, 141
  30. Lippert R., 1987, School Science and Mathematics, 87, 407, 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1987.tb11735.x · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1987.tb11735.x
  31. Mayer R. E., 1976, Memory & Cognition, 4, 249, 10.3758/BF03213171 · DOI
  32. Mayer R. E., 1992, The nature and origin of mathematical skills.
  33. Mazur E., 1997, Peer instruction.
  34. McGuinness C., 1986, Memory & Cognition, 14, 270, 10.3758/BF03197703 · DOI
  35. Meacham J. A., 1989, Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications, 7
  36. Nickerson R. S., 1985, The teaching of thinking.
  37. Ploetzner R., 1993, Multiple mental representations of information in physics problems.
  38. Ploetzner R., 1998, Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 95, 10.1080/1049482980050107 · DOI
  39. Ploetzner R., 1999, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 214, 10.1207/s15327809jls0802_1 · DOI
  40. Polich J.M., 1974, Memory & Cognition, 2, 683, 10.3758/BF03198139 · DOI
  41. Potts G.R., 1975, Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14, 452, 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80023-5 · DOI
  42. Reed S.K., 1987, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 124
  43. Reimann P., 1989, Human and machine problem solving, 161, 10.1007/978-1-4684-8015-3_7 · DOI
  44. Rogoff B., 1984, Everyday cognition: Its development in social context.
  45. Salomon G., 1988, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 123, 10.2190/4LU7-VW23-EGB1-AW5G · DOI
  46. Savelsbergh E.R., 1998, Physics learning with a computer algebra system: Towards a learning environment that promotes enhanced problem representations.
  47. Schkade D.A., 1994, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 319, 10.1006/obhd.1994.1018 · DOI
  48. Schwartz S. H., 1971, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 347, 10.1037/h0031856 · DOI
  49. Schwartz S. H., 1973, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 343, 10.1037/h0033669 · doi:10.1037/h0033669
  50. Simon D. P., 1978, Handbook of learning and cognitive process.
  51. Sweller J., 1994, Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185, 10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Simon D. P., 1978, Handbook of learning and cognitive process.
  53. Singly M. K., 1989, The transfer of cognitive skill.
  54. Slack S., 1990, Journal of Biological Education, 23, 308, 10.1080/00219266.1989.9655087 · doi:10.1080/00219266.1989.9655087
  55. Spitulnik J., 1995, Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning.
  56. Starfield A. M., 1990, How to model it: Problem solving for the computer age.
  57. Wood P. K., 1983, Human Development, 26, 249, 10.1159/000272887 · DOI
  58. Zhang J., 1997, Cognitive Science, 21, 179, 10.1207/s15516709cog2102_3 · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2102_3 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Jonassen, D.
Venue
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2003-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
362-381
ISSN
  • 1539-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0818
DOI
10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391
OpenAlex
W2031312047
Cited by
285
References
5
FWCI
17.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.