Cited by 209Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareUsability and User Interface DesignInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

An integrated patient journey mapping tool for embedding quality in healthcare service reform

Open access
McCarthy, Stephen, O’Raghallaigh, Paidi, Woodworth, Simon, Lim, Yoke Lin, Kenny, Louise C., Adam, Frédéric·2016·Journal of Decision Systems

Abstract

The healthcare sector is a highly regulated environment that is subject to numerous constraints. Standards around medical protocol, medical device certification, and data protection ensure that the wellbeing and privacy of patients is protected during all encounters with the healthcare system. However, a gap has opened up between the need to meet these constraints, improve performance, and also deliver good patient experience. For example, the medical protocol for hypertension during pregnancy establishes a set of clinically validated treatment guidelines, but does not consider the unique nature of patient experience. We assert that design research principles can be used to create visual tools that pay homage to these constraints and performance improvement goals without compromising patient experience. In this paper, we describe such a tool that has been developed during a healthcare project using a human-centred design research approach. The integrated tool for patient journey mapping addresses the shortcomings of existing methodologies by supporting multidisciplinary practitioners in designing healthcare solutions that meet the demands of existing constraints, performance improvement, and patient experience. In addition, we document how patient journey maps were used on the project to facilitate collaboration among a team of multidisciplinary stakeholders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/12460125.2016.1187394

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Journey maps go beyond a static view of patients' perspectives by illustrating key moments in a patient's journey, including important touchpoints, pain points, and the emotions experienced.

    “Journey maps go beyond a static view of patients' perspectives by illustrating key moments in a patient’s journey, including important touchpoints, pain points, and the emotions experienced [7, 21].”

    From The hospital-to-home care transition experience of home care clients: an exploratory study using patient journey mapping (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 2.2.1 describes journey maps as a dynamic view of successive patient–service touchpoints that captures feelings across episodes of care. Table 2 also describes an emotional journey that can show despair. The copy does not establish that journey maps specifically illustrate pain points, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patient journey mapping has been effectively used to understand patient experience, improve quality of care, and inform health service redesign/improvement.

    “Of the existing literature, patient journey mapping has been effectively used to understand the patient experience [16–18], improve the quality of care [7, 19], and for informing health service redesign/improvement [13, 15, 20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Conklin, J. (2006). Wicked problems and social complexity. Dialog Mapping: Building Shared Under- standing of Wicked Problems. Wiley, Chichester.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, S., O’Raghallaigh, P., Woodworth, S., Lim, Y. L., Kenny, L. C., & Adam, F.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Stephen
Venue
Journal of Decision Systems
Published
2016-06-10
Volume
25
Issue
sup1
Pages
354-368
ISSN
  • 1246-0125 (ISSN-L)
  • 2116-7052
OpenAlex
W2439336815
Cited by
209
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Decision System (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/12/RC/2272)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
patient journey mapping, patient experience, human-centered design, visual design tools, multidisciplinary collaboration, hypertension in pregnancy, quality of care, stakeholder collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review