Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,853

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers

Schmidt, Denise A., Baran, Evrim, Thompson, Ann D., Mishra, Punya, Koehler, Matthew J., Shin, Tae S.·2009·Journal of Research on Technology in Education
DOI 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Based in Shulman’s idea of Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) has emerged as a useful frame for describing and understanding the goals for technology use in preservice teacher education. This paper addresses the need for a survey instrument designed to assess TPACK for preservice teachers. The paper describes survey development process and results from a pilot study on 124 preservice teachers. Data analysis procedures included Cronbach’s alpha statistics on the TPACK knowledge domains and factor analysis for each domain. Results suggest that, with the modification and/or deletion of 18 of the survey items, the survey is a reliable and valid instrument that will help educators design longitudinal studies to assess preservice teachers’ development of TPACK.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE) Committee on Innovation and Technology. (2008). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  2. Angeli C., 2009, Computers & Education, 52, 154, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006 · DOI
  3. Angeli C., 2005, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 292, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Christensen R., 1996, Constructing the teachers’ attitudes toward computers (TAC) questionnaire.
  5. Davis, N. & Thompson, A. (2005). The evaluation of technology-related professional development, Part 2. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2005 (pp. 825–830). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  6. Franklin, C. (2004). Teacher preparation as a critical factor in elementary teachers: Use of computers. In R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2004 (pp. 4994–4999). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  7. Hughes J., 2004, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4, 345
  8. Irving, K. E. (2006). The impact of technology on the 21 st -century classroom. In J. Rhoton & P. Shane (Eds.), Teaching science in the 21 st century (pp. 3–20). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
  9. Keating, T. & Evans, E. (2001). Three computers in the back of the classroom: Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of technology integration. In R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 2001 (pp. 1671–1676). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  10. Keller J. B., 2005, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 329, 10.2190/68XG-THRV-HT4D-ECA4 · DOI
  11. Knezek, G. & Christensen, R. (1998). Internal consistency reliability for the teachers’ attitudes toward information technology (TAT) questionnaire. In S. McNeil, J. D. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin, & J. Willis (Eds.), Technology and Teacher Education Annual 1998, Vol. 2 (pp. 831–832). Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  12. Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Koehler M. J., 2005, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131, 10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV · DOI · Paper page
  14. Koehler M. J., 2007, Computers and Education, 49, 740, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Margerum-Leys J., 2002, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 427, 10.2190/JXBR-2G0G-1E4T-7T4M · DOI
  16. McCrory R., 2004, American Educational Research Journal, 41, 447, 10.3102/00028312041002447 · DOI
  17. Mishra P., 1998, Dissertation Abstracts International, 59
  18. Moersch C., 1995, Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 40
  19. Niess M. L., 2005, Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509, 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pierson M. E., 1999, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 711
  21. Pierson M. E., 2001, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 413, 10.1080/08886504.2001.10782325 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Preston C., 2004, Learning to use ICT in classrooms: Teachers’ and trainers’ perspectives.
  23. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J. & Shin, T. S. (2009). Examining preservice teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge in an introductory instructional technology course. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference book, 2009 (pp. 4145–4151). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  24. Shin, T. S., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E. & Thompson, A. D. (2009). Changing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through course experiences. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference book, 2009 (pp. 4152–4156). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  25. Slough, S. & Connell, M. (2006). Defining technology and its natural corollary, technological content knowledge (TCK). In C. Crawford, D. Willis, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, & R. Weber (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 2006 (pp. 1053–1059). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  26. Wetzel K., 2008, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25, 67, 10.1080/10402454.2008.10784611 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,853

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S.
Venue
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-12
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
123-149
ISSN
  • 1539-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0818
DOI
10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
OpenAlex
W1499368215
Cited by
1,853
References
3
FWCI
161.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
The paper
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.