Cited by 21Construction Engineering and SafetyStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisSeismic Performance and Analysis

Experimental and numerical investigation of timber formwork beam under different loading type

Dönmez, T. Ünal, Türer, Abdullah, Anil, Özgür, Erdem, R. Tuğrul·2022·Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines

Abstract

With the developing construction technologies, the formwork systems used in the manufacturing of the structures have also changed and developed significantly. Especially in the production of high-rise buildings, a special sliding formwork system that is quick-installation, resistant to external loads, can be used more than once, are widely used and preferred. Timber and composite timber materials are preferred due to their durability, ease of installation, lightness compared to steel systems, and easy to use more than one time. Within the scope of this study, it was aimed to investigate the performance and behaviors of timber beams of 1800 and 2450 mm length experimentally under the influence of different loading types in H20 top P-type, which is among the products of DOKA Company. During the use of timber formwork beams, various loading types such as static, fatigue, and sudden dynamic impact load can be affected. For this reason, an experimental study was carried out, and general load-displacement behaviors, initial stiffness, displacement ductility ratios, energy dissipation capacities, collapse mechanisms, acceleration, displacement, and impact load-time behaviors under the effect of monotonic static, repetitive fatigue and impact loading of two different length timber formwork specimens were examined. In addition to experimental study, nonlinear numerical analysis is made by using ABAQUS software for experimental specimens and compared with results with an experimental s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15397734.2020.1749071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dönmez, T. Ü., Türer, A., Anil, Ö., & Erdem, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Gazi University (TR)
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University (TR)
  • Civil Engineering Department, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
Venue
Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
1090-1110
ISSN
  • 0360-1218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7734
  • 1539-7742
OpenAlex
W3016214629
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines (publishedVersion)
  • AYBU AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Construction Engineering and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
Keywords
sliding formwork, fatigue loading, impact loading, monotonic static loading, load-displacement behavior, initial stiffness, ductility ratio, energy dissipation, collapse mechanism, nonlinear numerical analysis, high-rise building construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review