CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 97

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regeneration of Chitosan-Based Adsorbents for Eliminating Dyes from Aqueous Solutions

Vakili, Mohammadtaghi, Deng, Shubo, Shen, Lu, Shan, Danna, Liu, Dengchao, Yu, Gang·2019·Separation & Purification Reviews
DOI 10.1080/15422119.2017.1406860
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Chitosan and its derivatives are effective for adsorbing dye molecules from aqueous solutions. However, their use can be limited by environmental concerns on their fate after adsorbent saturation. Desorbing dye molecules and regenerating adsorbents are alternatives to disposing spent adsorbent. In this review, most research topics related to regenerating chitosan-based adsorbents for dye removal are summarized and discussed. Numerous desorption agents, such as acids, alkalis, salts, and organic solvents, have been applied to regenerate chitosan-based adsorbents and recover the adsorbed dye molecules. In addition, the mechanism of desorbing dye molecules from these adsorbents is examined to provide information on selecting methods for recovering chitosan-based adsorbents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15422119.2017.1406860

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adsorption has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes.

    “Comparatively, the adsorption method is considered a better treatment process in wastewater treatment technologies due to ease of operation, convenience, and simplicity of design (Aragaw and Angerasa, 2020;Aragaw, 2020), but it has a limitation of sludge generation (spent adsorbents after use) as other removal processes (Patel, 2021;Vakili et al., 2019).”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Vakili et al., 2019

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1016/j.aej.2014.03.003 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11783-017-0899-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.017 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11783-017-0979-6 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.023 · DOI
  6. Shah I.K., 2013, J. Chem. Sci., 2, 1078
  7. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.027 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.030 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s11783-017-0954-2 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10934-016-0359-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11783-013-0622-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.080 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.063 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.11.001 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.019 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199608)66:4<355::AID-JCTB519>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00083-X · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.psep.2016.11.024 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.077 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.001 · DOI
  21. 10.1039/c3ra46035e · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.12.015 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.08.018 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.11.020 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.033 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jece.2013.10.005 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.05.044 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.04.007 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00636-7 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.085 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.071 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.014 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.025 · DOI
  34. Szygula A., 2008, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Waste Management, Water Pollution, Air Pollution, Indoor Climate (WWAI’08)
  35. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.018 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.03.025 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.012 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.009 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.06.023 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.083 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.051 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.087 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.066 · DOI
  44. Wang P., 2013, BioResources, 8, 6026
  45. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.026 · DOI
  46. Sarkar K., 2012, Hydrol. Current. Res., 3, 7
  47. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.008 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.071 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.033 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.104 · DOI
  51. Umpuch C., 2013, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 35, 451
  52. 10.1016/j.desal.2009.04.010 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62267-6 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jece.2016.04.003 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jece.2016.02.035 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.066 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.05.038 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.109 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.08.003 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.02.019 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.080 · DOI
  62. Sarkar K., 2012, Hydrol. Current. Res., 3, 8
  63. 10.14429/dsj.64.7318 · DOI
  64. 10.2166/wst.2013.217 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.065 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s13201-016-0405-4 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.04.012 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.048 · DOI
  69. 10.2965/jwet.15-072 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.11.023 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.11.010 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.075 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.045 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.010 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.12.016 · DOI
  76. Skoog D., 2013, Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry
  77. 10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.015 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.075 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.057 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.07.037 · DOI
  81. 10.1111/cote.12066 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.069 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.09.010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vakili, M., Deng, S., Shen, L., Shan, D., Liu, D., & Yu, G.
Affiliations
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Beijing Key Laboratory for Emerging Organic Contaminants Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Venue
Separation & Purification Reviews
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-12-06
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 1542-2119
  • 1542-2127
DOI
10.1080/15422119.2017.1406860
Cited by
97
References
1
Language
en
Funders
National Key Research on Water Environment Pollution Control in China (2017ZX07202-001)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review