The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robustness and Vulnerability of Scale-Free Random Graphs
Open accessAbstract
Recently many new "scale-free" random graph models have been introduced, motivated by the power-law degree sequences observed in many large-scale, real-world networks. Perhaps the best known, the Barabási-Albert model, has been extensively studied from heuristic and experimental points of view. Here we consider mathematically two basic characteristics of a precise version of this model, the LCD model, namely robustness to random damage, and vulnerability to malicious attack. We show that the LCD graph is much more robust than classical random graphs with the same number of edges, but also more vulnerable to attack. In particular, if vertices of the _n_-vertex LCD graph are deleted at random, then as long as any positive proportion remains, the graph induced on the remaining vertices has a component of order _n_. In contrast, if the deleted vertices are chosen maliciously, a constant fraction less then 1 can be deleted to destroy all large components. For the Barabási-Albert model, these questions have been studied experimentally and heuristically by several groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Statistical mechanics of complex networks
Albert, R., & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.47 · Cited by 20,471
Error and attack tolerance of complex networksPreprint
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-Ĺ. (2000) · Cited by 6,467
Bollobás, B. (1985) · Cited by 6,196
Self-citationOn power-law relationships of the Internet topology
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999) · Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication · doi:10.1145/316188.316229 · Cited by 4,196
Dorogovtsev, S. N., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2002) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018730110112519 · Cited by 3,171
ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
SIMON, H. A. (1955) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/42.3-4.425 · Cited by 2,771
Network Robustness and Fragility: Percolation on Random Graphs
Callaway, D. S., Newman, M. E. J., Strogatz, S. H., & Watts, D. J. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5468 · Cited by 2,480
Resilience of the Internet to Random Breakdowns
Cohen, R., Erez, K., ben-Avraham, D., & Havlin, S. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4626 · Cited by 2,391
Metadata
- Authors
- Bollobás, B., & Riordan, O.
- Venue
- Internet Mathematics
- Publisher
- Internet Mathematics
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 1542-7951 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9488
- OpenAlex
- W1984495995
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness and Vulnerability of Scale-Free Random Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15427951.2004.10129080
- The paper
- Bollobás, B., & Riordan, O. (2004). Robustness and Vulnerability of Scale-Free Random Graphs. Internet Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427951.2004.10129080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.