A Microalgae-Based Biodiesel Refinery: Sustainability Concerns and Challenges
Abstract
The interest in using microalgae to produce biodiesel is rapidly increasing in an effort to search for renewable and alternative energy. In an attempt to support algal biodiesel industry, the exploration of sustainability concerns involved in biodiesel refinery is becoming more and more necessary and important. From a sustainability perspective, this paper addresses the environmental, economic, social, and cultural implications of microalgae-based biodiesel refinery. From an environmental standpoint, there are four main related concerns: first, less water is required and water used can be recycled greatly, but it might cause water and even groundwater pollution; second, although low-value lands can be used for construction, it might cause land use changes and soil erosion; third, infrastructure construction and eutrophication by water pollution will threaten on local biodiversity; finally, there are some disputes of energy input and greenhouse gases emissions. From an economic point of view, the main benefit lies in an increase of employment and incomes, while the main drawback is the overwhelming investments required due to high costs. Socially, it can improve energy security and create jobs, while, on the other hand, it might affect the health of local animals and people. From a cultural viewpoint, algal biodiesel concept is a new element, and it requires time for people to adapt. With effective use of measures in technologies and policies, the microalgae-derived biodiesel industry will commercialize at levels of sustainability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Share of biofuels used for transport in EU rose from 7.4% in 2017 to 8.1% in 2018, below EU target.
“Although the share of biofuels used for transport in the EU rose from 7.4% in 2017 to 8.1% in 2018, this is below the EU target [103].”
From The Perspective of Large-Scale Production of Algae Biodiesel (2020) · cites this paper as [103]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 56
- Authors
- Zhu, L., Huo, S., & Qin, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Vaasa (FI)
- Jiangsu University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Green Energy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-12-22
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 595-602
- ISSN
- 1543-5075 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-5083
- OpenAlex
- W2049389158
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Green Energy (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Guangzhou Institute of Energy Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
- Fortums Stiftelse
- Etelä-Pohjanmaan Rahasto
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Keywords
- microalgae, algal biodiesel, sustainability assessment, water pollution, land use change, soil erosion, eutrophication, greenhouse gas emissions, energy security, employment and income, investment costs, renewable energy policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review