Cited by 111Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAir Quality and Health ImpactsAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Particle Resuspension During the Use of Vacuum Cleaners on Residential Carpet

Corsi, Richard L., Siegel, Jeffrey A., Chiang, Chunyi·2008·Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

Abstract

Vacuuming is generally considered to be an important activity with respect to the cleanliness of indoor environments but may lead to short-term resuspension of particulate matter and elevated particle mass in indoor air. Because resuspended particles often contain toxicants, such as lead and pesticides, or consist of biological agents that can trigger allergic reactions, it is important to understand the role of vacuuming on short-term variations in indoor particulate matter concentrations. The inhalation of particles during vacuuming events may affect adversely those whose occupation requires them to clean a wide range of indoor environments, from homes to schools and offices, as well as those who occupy those environments. In response, a series of 46 experiments was completed to determine time-variant concentrations of both PM(10) and PM(2.5) during various vacuuming activities in 12 separate apartments. Experiments involved the use of two different non-HEPA vacuum cleaners and were completed with a vacuum cleaner activated (switched on) as well as deactivated (switched off). The latter was intended to provide insight on the potential for resuspension of particles by the mechanical agitation of vacuum cleaner movement across carpet. Separate experiments were completed also using "mock" vacuuming simulations, that is, walking on the carpet in a manner consistent with using a vacuum cleaner. Results are presented as incremental particulate matter concentration increases, relative to background (prevacuum) concentrations, and peak-to-background particle concentration ratios. Results indicate significant resuspension of PM(10) mass during vacuum cleaning, with a mean time-averaged PM(10) increase of greater than 17 mu g/m(3) above background. Resuspension of PM(2.5) mass was determined to be small, that is, PM(10) mass was dominated by particles greater than 2.5 mu m. The frequency of vacuuming (between a 10-day standard frequency and several experiments at > 24 days between vacuuming) had little influence on resuspended particle mass. Resuspension by mechanical agitation (rolling of vacuum cleaner across carpet) with the vacuum cleaner switched off was determined to be substantial, with a mean time-averaged (during vacuuming) PM(10) increase of 35 mu g/m(3) relative to background. Peak-to-background PM(10) concentrations exceeded 6 for some experiments and averaged between approximately 3 and 4 for experiments when the vacuum cleaner was switched on.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15459620801901165

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Pope C. A., 1995, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 151, 669, 10.1164/ajrccm/151.3_Pt_1.669 · DOI
  2. Samet J. M., 2000, N. Engl. J. Med., 343, 1742, 10.1056/NEJM200012143432401 · DOI
  3. Somers C. M., 2004, Science, 304, 1008, 10.1126/science.1095815 · DOI
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1994, National Human Activity Pattern Survey Data Base
  5. Nazaroff W. W., 2004, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2841, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Simpson A., 1998, Allergy, 53, 602, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03936.x · DOI
  7. Bellanti J. A., 2000, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 84, 249, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62762-7 · DOI
  8. Arlian L. G., 2001, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 87, 296, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62243-0 · DOI
  9. Vojta P. J., 2001, Environ. Health Perspect., 109, 815, 10.1289/ehp.01109815 · DOI
  10. Causer S. M., 2004, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 1, 237, 10.1080/15459620490432169 · DOI
  11. Dybendal T., 1994, Allergy, 49, 210, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb02651.x · DOI
  12. Raunio P., 1998, Allergy, 53, 195, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03870.x · DOI
  13. Cohn R. D., 2004, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 113, 1167, 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.12.592 · DOI
  14. Phipatanakul W., 2004, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 92, 420, 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61777-2 · DOI
  15. Franke D. L., 1997, Indoor Air, 7, 41, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-3-00006.x · DOI
  16. Warner J. A., 2000, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 105, 75, 10.1016/S0091-6749(00)90181-7 · DOI
  17. Bischof W., 2002, Indoor Air, 12, 2, 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.120102.x · DOI
  18. McNally N. J., 2001, Br. J. Dermatol., 145, 730, 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04474.x · DOI
  19. de Blay F., 1998, Allergy, 53, 411, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03914.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Abt E., 2000, Environ. Health Perspect., 108, 35, 10.1289/ehp.0010835 · DOI
  21. Ferro A. R., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1759, 10.1021/es0263893 · DOI
  22. Montoya L. D., 2005, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 735, 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.11.004 · DOI
  23. Montoya L. D., 2001, Atmos. Environ., 35, 859, 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00379-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Long C. M., 2000, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 50, 1236, 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464154 · DOI
  25. Thatcher T. L., 1995, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1487, 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00016-R · DOI
  26. Lioy P. J., 1999, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 49, 200, 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463789 · DOI
  27. Afshari A., 2005, Indoor Air, 15, 141, 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00332.x · DOI
  28. Hines W. W., 1980, Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Corsi, R. L., Siegel, J. A., & Chiang, C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2008-04-09
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
232-238
ISSN
  • 1545-9624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9632
OpenAlex
W2161887640
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Texas at Austin
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Keywords
vacuuming, particle resuspension, indoor particulate matter, PM10, PM2.5, indoor air quality, mechanical agitation
MeSH terms
Air Movements, Environmental Exposure, Filtration, Floors and Floorcoverings, Household Work, Humans, Particle Size, Air Pollution, Indoor, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particle Resuspension During the Use of Vacuum Cleaners on Residential Carpet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15459620801901165
The paper
Corsi, R. L., Siegel, J. A., & Chiang, C. (2008). Particle Resuspension During the Use of Vacuum Cleaners on Residential Carpet. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620801901165