The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The dental curing light: A potential health risk
Abstract
Powerful blue-light emitting dental curing lights are used in dental offices to photocure resins in the mouth. In addition, many dental personnel use magnification loupes. This study measured the effect of magnification loupes on the "blue light hazard" when the light from a dental curing light was reflected off a human tooth. Loupes with 3.5x magnification (Design for Vision, Carl Zeiss, and Quality Aspirator) and 2.5x magnification (Design for Vision and Quality Aspirator) were placed at the entrance of an integrating sphere connected to a spectrometer (USB 4000, Ocean Optics). A model with human teeth was placed 40 cm away and in line with this sphere. The light guide tip of a broad-spectrum Sapphire Plus (Den-Mat) curing light was positioned at a 45° angle from the facial surface of the central incisor. The spectral radiant power reflected from the teeth was recorded five times with the loupes over the entrance into the sphere. The maximum permissible cumulative exposure times in an 8-hr day were calculated using guidelines set by the ACGIH. It was concluded that at a 40 cm distance, the maximum permissible cumulative daily exposure time to light reflected from the tooth was approximately 11 min without loupes. The weighted blue irradiance values were significantly different for each brand of loupe (Fisher's PLSD p < 0.05) and were up to eight times greater at the pupil than when loupes were not used. However, since the linear dimensions of the resulting images would be 2…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All forms of high-energy lights that are a potential health risk for humans are likely also the same for the dental therapy dog.
“All forms of high‐energy lights that are a potential health risk for humans (Price, Labrie, Bruzell, Sliney, & Strassler, 2016 are likely also the same for the dental therapy dog.”
From Dog‐assisted therapy in the dental clinic. Part B. Hazards and assessment of potential risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog (2019) · cites this paper as Price, Labrie, Bruzell, Sliney, & Strassler, 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.768 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.003 · DOI
- Heintze S.D., 2012, J. Adhes. Dent., 14, 407
- 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.788 · DOI
- 10.1111/idj.12151 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00115.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.014 · DOI
- International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 1997, Health Phys., 73, 539
- Ham W.T., 1983, J. Occup. Med., 25, 101
- 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00627.x · DOI
- 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31821cbcc9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.05.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/eye.1999.142 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.018 · DOI
- Sliney D.H., 2006, Medicina del Lavoro, 97, 215
- 10.1159/000060814 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01174.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90032-G · DOI
- Labrie D., 2011, J. Canad. Dent. Assoc., 77, b116
- ISO:10650-1:2004, 2004, Dentistry-Powered Polymerization Activators: Part 1: Quartz Tungsten Halogen Lamps
- ISO: 10650-2:2007, 2007, Dentistry-Powered Polymerization Activators: Part 2: Light-emitting Diode (LED) Lamps
- 10.1080/15459620701354218 · DOI
- 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0038 · DOI
- 10.1016/0300-5712(87)90090-X · DOI
- Federlin M., 2013, J. Dent. Educ., 77, 764, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.6.tb05528.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.017 · DOI
- Hill E.E., 2006, J. Dent. Educ., 70, 1294, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.12.tb04231.x · DOI
- 10.14219/jada.2013.17 · DOI
- Spranley T.J., 2012, Gen. Dent., 60, e210
- 10.1177/0022034515594786 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345970760081401 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00124-6 · DOI
- 10.2310/6130.2006.00007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10266-013-0123-4 · DOI
- 10.2341/13-283-L · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.023 · DOI
- Stamatacos C., 2013, J. Tenn. Dent. Assoc., 93, 25
- 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0317 · DOI
- Christensen G.J., 2013, Clin. Rep., 6
- Foster C.D., 1988, Biomed. Sci. Instrument., 24, 251
- 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb00518.x · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345870660030501 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00784-003-0248-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.013 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-662-07677-4 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004032-200002000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1038/260153a0 · DOI
- 10.1039/b813132e · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gussgard, A. M., Weese, J. S., Hensten, A., & Jokstad, A. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Dental Research · doi:10.1002/cre2.239 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, R. B. T., Labrie, D., Bruzell, E. M., Sliney, D. H., & Strassler, H. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-05-25
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 639-646
- ISSN
- 1545-9624
- 1545-9632
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review