Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The dental curing light: A potential health risk

Price, Richard B.T., Labrie, Daniel, Bruzell, Ellen M., Sliney, David H., Strassler, Howard E.·2016·Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

Abstract

Powerful blue-light emitting dental curing lights are used in dental offices to photocure resins in the mouth. In addition, many dental personnel use magnification loupes. This study measured the effect of magnification loupes on the "blue light hazard" when the light from a dental curing light was reflected off a human tooth. Loupes with 3.5x magnification (Design for Vision, Carl Zeiss, and Quality Aspirator) and 2.5x magnification (Design for Vision and Quality Aspirator) were placed at the entrance of an integrating sphere connected to a spectrometer (USB 4000, Ocean Optics). A model with human teeth was placed 40 cm away and in line with this sphere. The light guide tip of a broad-spectrum Sapphire Plus (Den-Mat) curing light was positioned at a 45° angle from the facial surface of the central incisor. The spectral radiant power reflected from the teeth was recorded five times with the loupes over the entrance into the sphere. The maximum permissible cumulative exposure times in an 8-hr day were calculated using guidelines set by the ACGIH. It was concluded that at a 40 cm distance, the maximum permissible cumulative daily exposure time to light reflected from the tooth was approximately 11 min without loupes. The weighted blue irradiance values were significantly different for each brand of loupe (Fisher's PLSD p < 0.05) and were up to eight times greater at the pupil than when loupes were not used. However, since the linear dimensions of the resulting images would be 2…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15459624.2016.1165822

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.768 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.021 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.003 · DOI
  4. Heintze S.D., 2012, J. Adhes. Dent., 14, 407
  5. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.788 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/idj.12151 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1983.tb00115.x · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.014 · DOI
  9. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 1997, Health Phys., 73, 539
  10. Ham W.T., 1983, J. Occup. Med., 25, 101
  11. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.04.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00627.x · DOI
  13. 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31821cbcc9 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.05.001 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/eye.1999.142 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.06.009 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.018 · DOI
  18. Sliney D.H., 2006, Medicina del Lavoro, 97, 215
  19. 10.1159/000060814 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01174.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90032-G · DOI
  22. Labrie D., 2011, J. Canad. Dent. Assoc., 77, b116
  23. ISO:10650-1:2004, 2004, Dentistry-Powered Polymerization Activators: Part 1: Quartz Tungsten Halogen Lamps
  24. ISO: 10650-2:2007, 2007, Dentistry-Powered Polymerization Activators: Part 2: Light-emitting Diode (LED) Lamps
  25. 10.1080/15459620701354218 · DOI
  26. 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0038 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0300-5712(87)90090-X · DOI
  28. Federlin M., 2013, J. Dent. Educ., 77, 764, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.6.tb05528.x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.017 · DOI
  30. Hill E.E., 2006, J. Dent. Educ., 70, 1294, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.12.tb04231.x · DOI
  31. 10.14219/jada.2013.17 · DOI
  32. Spranley T.J., 2012, Gen. Dent., 60, e210
  33. 10.1177/0022034515594786 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/00220345970760081401 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00124-6 · DOI
  36. 10.2310/6130.2006.00007 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10266-013-0123-4 · DOI
  39. 10.2341/13-283-L · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.023 · DOI
  41. Stamatacos C., 2013, J. Tenn. Dent. Assoc., 93, 25
  42. 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0317 · DOI
  43. Christensen G.J., 2013, Clin. Rep., 6
  44. Foster C.D., 1988, Biomed. Sci. Instrument., 24, 251
  45. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb00518.x · DOI
  46. 10.1177/00220345870660030501 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/s00784-003-0248-x · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.013 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/978-3-662-07677-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1097/00004032-200002000-00002 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/260153a0 · DOI
  52. 10.1039/b813132e · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Price, R. B. T., Labrie, D., Bruzell, E. M., Sliney, D. H., & Strassler, H. E.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Published
2016-05-25
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
639-646
ISSN
  • 1545-9624
  • 1545-9632
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review