The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An exploratory study of noise exposures in educational and private dental clinics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many share the view, based on sound level measurements and questionnaire responses, that dental clinic staff members are placing their hearing health at risk in a typical daily work environment.
“However, many share the view, based on sound level measurements and questionnaire responses, that dental clinic staff members are placing their hearing health at risk in a typical daily work environment (Burk & Neitzel, 2016; Myers, John, Kimball, & Fruits, 2016).”
From Dog‐assisted therapy in the dental clinic. Part B. Hazards and assessment of potential risks to the health and safety of the dental therapy dog (2019) · cites this paper as Burk & Neitzel, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Sataloff R.T., 1996, Occupational Hearing Loss
- Franks J., 1988, Semin. Hear., 9, 287
- 10.1002/ajim.22082 · DOI
- Theodoroff S., 2015, Gen. Dent., 63, 71
- Messano G.A., 2012, J. Dent. 40(10):821–828
- Daud M., 2011, B-ENT, 7, 245
- 10.3928/21650799-20140815-02 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3913(81)90336-X · DOI
- Setcos J.C., 1998, Int. J. Prosthodont., 11, 150
- 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00393.x · DOI
- 10.4103/0970-9290.87065 · DOI
- 10.4103/1463-1741.140511 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X · DOI
- OSHA: Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing Conservation Amendment. Final Rule. Fed Reg. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Labor, 1983. pp. 9738–9785
- Willershausen B., 2014, Head Face Med, 10
- Dutta A., 2015, J. Conserv. Dent.
- Jadid K., 2011, Pediatr. Dent., 33, 343
- Sampaio Fernandes J.C., 2006, Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 10(1):32–37
- Earshen, J.: Sound Measurement: Instrumentation and Noise Descriptors. In The Noise Manual, 5th ed., E.H. Berger, L.H. Royster, J.D. Royster, D.P. Driscoll, M.L. Layne (eds.). Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association (2000). pp. 41–100.
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.112 · DOI
- Al-Dujaili M., 2014, N Z Dent. J., 110, 105
- Choosong T., 2011, Saf. Health Work 2(4):348–354
- Yousuf A., 2014, J. Clin. Diagnost. Res., 8
- 10.5491/SHAW.2011.2.4.348 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90222-A · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jecm.2013.08.009 · DOI
- 10.1080/00028899908984506 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200004)37:4<334::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1080/15428110208984709 · DOI
- Byck G., 2006, J. Dent. Educ., 70, 1023, 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2006.70.10.tb04174.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gussgard, A. M., Weese, J. S., Hensten, A., & Jokstad, A. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Dental Research · doi:10.1002/cre2.239 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Burk, A., & Neitzel, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-08-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 741-749
- ISSN
- 1545-9624
- 1545-9632
- PMC
- PMC4992430
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
