The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue
Open accessAbstract
Since publication of the Brundtland Report in 1987, the notion of sustainable development has come to guide the pursuit of environmental reform by both public and private organizations and to facilitate communication among actors from different societal spheres. It is customary to characterize sustainable development in a familiar typology comprising three pillars: environmental, economic, and social. The relationships among these dimensions are generally assumed to be compatible and mutually supportive. However, previous research has found that when policy makers endorse sustainable development, the social dimension garners less attention and is particularly difficult to realize and operationalize. Recent years though have seen notable efforts among standard setters, planners, and practitioners in various sectors to address the often neglected social aspects of sustainability. Likewise, during the past decade, there have been efforts to develop theoretical frameworks to define and study social sustainability and to empirically investigate it in relation to “sustainability projects,” “sustainability practice,” and “sustainability initiatives.” This introductory article presents the topic and explains some of the challenges of incorporating social sustainability into a broad framework of sustainable development. Also considered is the potential of the social sustainability concept for sustainability projects and planning. This analysis is predicated on the work represented in this special issue and on related initiatives that explicitly discuss the social pillar of sustainable development and its relationship to the other dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Sustainable development: mapping different approaches
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O'Brien, G. (2005) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.244 · Cited by 2,303
The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.417 · Cited by 1,920
Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory
Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005) · International Journal of Sustainable Development · doi:10.1504/ijsd.2005.007375 · Cited by 948
Lehtonen, M. (2004) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.019 · Cited by 717
‘Just sustainability’: the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?
Agyeman, J., & Evans, B. (2004) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00117.x · Cited by 496
(2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781849771771 · Cited by 483
Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept
Jacobs, M. (1999) · Fairness and Futurity · doi:10.1093/0198294891.003.0002 · Cited by 413
The five dimensions of sustainability
Seghezzo, L. (2009) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010903063669 · Cited by 411
Taylor, P. L. (2005) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.007 · Cited by 409
Cited by
Panda, T. K., Kumar, A., Jakhar, S., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kazancoglu, I., & Nayak, S. S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575 · Cited by 456
Chopin, P., Mubaya, C. P., Descheemaeker, K., Öborn, I., & Bergkvist, G. (2021) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00674-3 · Cited by 129
Operationalising just sustainability: towards a model for place-based governance
George, C., & Reed, M. G. (2017) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1101059 · Cited by 53
Labour rights training 2.0: the digitalisation of knowledge for workers in global supply chains
Sendlhofer, T., & Lernborg, C. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.173 · Cited by 40
Using conflict over risk management in the marine environment to strengthen measures of governance
Parlee, C. E., & Wiber, M. G. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10334-230405 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Boström, M.
- Venue
- Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1548-7733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1595197570
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
- The paper
- Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.