CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Coastal and Marine ManagementRisk Perception and ManagementSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Using conflict over risk management in the marine environment to strengthen measures of governance

Open access
Parlee, Courtenay E., Wiber, Melanie G.·2018·Ecology and Society
DOI 10.5751/es-10334-230405
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Parlee, C. E., and M. G. Wiber. 2018. Using conflict over risk management in the marine environment to strengthen measures of governance. Ecology and Society 23(4):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10334-230405

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-10334-230405

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Continuous, collaborative problem solving of multiscale decision-making that employs experimentation and conflict resolution has been shown to build capacity for resource self-management.

    “Continuous, collaborative problem solving of multiscale decision-making that employs experimentation and conflict resolution has been shown to build capacity for resource self-management (135).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [135]

    The ‘Lessons for Adaptive Comanagement’ section (page unavailable) supports collaborative problem solving, ongoing monitoring, and conflict resolution in marine-resource governance. It does not establish that experimentation and multiscale decision-making build capacity for resource self-management; the sentence presents that outcome as demonstrated when the cited discussion does not. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Armitage, D. R., R. Plummer, F. Berkes, R. I. Arthur, A. T. Charles, I. J. Davidson-Hunt, A. P. Diduck, N. C. Doubleday, D. S. Johnson, M. Marschke, P. McConney, E. W. Pinkerton, and E. K. Wollenberg. 2009. Adaptive co-management for social- ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(2):95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/070089 · DOI
  2. Barnett, A. J., M. G. Wiber, M. P. Rooney, and D. G. Curtis Maillet. 2016. The role of public participation GIS (PPGIS) and fishermen's perceptions of risk in marine debris mitigation in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Ocean and Coastal Management 133:85-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.002 · DOI
  3. Beckley, T., J. Parkins, and R. Stedman. 2002. Indicators of forest- dependent community sustainability: the evolution of research. Forestry Chronicle 78(5):626-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.5558/ tfc78626-5 · DOI
  4. Begg, G. A., R. L. Stephenson, T. Ward, B. M. Gillanders, and T. Smith. 2015. Practical steps to implementation of integrated marine management: report of a workshop, 13-15 April 2015. SARDI Publication F2015/000465-1, SARDI Research Report Series 848. Final Report for the Spencer Gulf Ecosystem and Development Initiative and the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. South Australian Research and Development Institute, Adelaide, Australia. [online] URL: http:// www.pir.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/256303/ Practical_steps_to_implementation_of_integrated_marine_management. pdf
  5. Berkes, F. 2010. Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37 (4):489-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689291000072X · DOI · Paper page
  6. Boström, M. 2012. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 8(1):3-14. https://doi. org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080 · DOI
  7. Carlsson, L., and F. Berkes. 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75(1):65-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008 · DOI
  8. Charles, A., M. Wiber, K. Bigney, D. Curtis, L. Wilson, R. Angus, J. Kearney, M. Landry, M. Recchia, H. Saulnier, and C. White. 2010. Integrated management: a coastal community perspective. Horizons 10(4):26-34. [online] URL: http://smu-facweb.smu.ca/~ charles/PDFS_2005/094.pdf Ecology and Society 23(4): 5 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss4/art5/
  9. Coleman, P. T. 2000. Power and conflict. Pages 108-130 in M. Deutsch and P. T. Coleman, editors. The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA.
  10. Dahl, A. L. 2012. Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators 17:14-19. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032 · DOI
  11. Davies, A. L., and R. M. White. 2012. Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management 112:160-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.032 · DOI
  12. Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P. C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652):1907-1912. http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1091015 Environment Canada. 2013. Kelly Cove Salmon Ltd. ordered to pay $500,000 for Federal Fisheries Act violations. News release. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Canada. [online] URL: http://ec.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=976258C 6-1&news=4487A585-B7EE-4596-BA5B-CEE27498E6EF · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton. 1991. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  14. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Habermas and Foucault: thinkers for civil society? British Journal of Sociology 49(2):210-232. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/591310 · DOI
  15. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Glavovic, B. C. 2015. On the frontline in the Anthropocene: adapting to climate change through deliberative coastal governance. Pages 51-100 in B. C Glavovic, M. Kelly, R. Kay, and A. Travers, editors. Climate change and the coast: building resilient communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  17. Glavovic, B. C. 2016. Towards deliberative coastal governance: insights from South Africa and the Mississippi Delta. Regional Environmental Change 16(2):353-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10113-014-0727-4 · DOI
  18. Habermas, J. 1987. The philosophical discourse of modernity: twelve lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  19. Hughes, T. P., D. R. Bellwood, C. Folke, R. S. Steneck, and J. Wilson. 2005. New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20 (7):380-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.022 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jentoft, S. 2011. Legal pluralism and the governability of fisheries and coastal systems. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 43(64):149-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2011.10756673 · DOI
  21. Jentoft, S., M. Bavinck, D. Johnson, and K. Thomson. 2009. Fisheries co-management and legal pluralism: how an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Human Organization 68 (1):27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.68.1.h87q04245t63094r Jentoft, S., and R. Chuenpagdee. 2009. Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy 33(4):553-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Johnson, D. W., R. Johnson, and D. Tjosvold. 2000. Constructive controversy: the value of intellectual opposition. Pages 65-85 in M. Deutsch and P. T. Coleman, editors. The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA.
  23. Kearney, J., F. Berkes., A. Charles, E. Pinkerton, and W. Wiber. 2007. The role of participatory governance and community-based management in integrated coastal and ocean management in Canada. Journal of Coastal Management 35(1):79-104. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/10.1080/08920750600970511 · DOI
  24. Keen, M., and S. Mahanty. 2006. Learning in sustainable natural resource management: challenges and opportunities in the Pacific. Society and Natural Resources 19(6):497-513. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/08941920600663896 · DOI
  25. Keohane, R. O. 2002. Global governance and democratic accountability. In D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi, editors. Taming globalization: frontiers of governance. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
  26. Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2012. Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research 15 (3):273-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.636838 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lemos, M. C., and A. Agrawal. 2006. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:297-325. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621 · DOI
  28. Lipton, P. 2000. A companion to the philosophy of science. Pages 184-193 in W. H. Newton-Smith, editor. A companion to the philosophy of science. Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Lockwood, M., J. Davidson, A. Curtis, E. Stratford, and R. Griffith. 2010. Governing principles for natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 23(10):986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214 Ecology and Society 23(4): 5 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss4/art5/ · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mather, C., J. P. Johnsen, S. Sonvisen, A. Sridhar, and J. Stephen. 2017. Introduction to the themed issue -Poststructural approaches to fisheries. Maritime Studies 16:20. http://dx.doi. org/10.1186/s40152-017-0074-4 · DOI
  31. Mattei, U., and L. Nader. 2008. Plunder: when the rule of law is illegal. Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/9780470696552 · DOI
  32. Melzer, E. 1998. International review of integrated coastal zone management. Oceans Conservation Report Series. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Ottawa, Canada. [online] URL: http:// www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/253987.pdf
  33. Nader, L. 1997. Controlling processes: tracing the dynamic components of power. Current Anthropology 38(5):711-737. https://doi.org/10.1086/204663 · DOI
  34. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management 34(1):75-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Parlee, C. E. 2016. Resolving conflict over risk management in the marine environment: strengthening governance institutions. Dissertation. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada. [online] URL: https://unbscholar.lib.unb.ca/islandora/ object/unbscholar%3A7858/
  36. Phyne, J. 1996. Along the coast and in the State: aquaculture and politics in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. In C. Bailey, S. Jentoft, and P. Sinclair, editors. Aquaculture development: social dimensions of an emerging industry. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  37. Pinkerton, E. W. 1994. Local fisheries co-management: a review of international experiences and their implications for salmon management in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51(10):2363-2378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/ f94-238 · DOI
  38. Reed, M. S., E. D. G. Fraser, and A. J. Dougill. 2006. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics 59 (4):406-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.008 · DOI
  39. Sarewitz, D. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy 7 (5):385-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 Southwest New Brunswick Marine Advisory Committee (SNBMAC). 2013. Consensus based advice/recommendations on marine debris. SNBMAC, Saint John, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.bofmrp.ca/home/images/uploads/MAC_Advice_Rec ommendations_Marine_Debris_September_25_2013_Final_2.pdf · DOI · Paper page
  40. Stephenson, R. L., S. Paul, M. Wiber, E. Angel, A. Benson, A. Charles, O. Chouinard, M. Clemens, D. Edwards, P. Foley, L. Jennings, O. Jones, D. Lane, J. McIsaac, C. Mussells, B. Neis, B. Nordstrom, C. Parlee, E. Pinkerton, M. Saunders, K. Squires, and U. R. Sumaila. 2018a. Evaluating and implementing social- ecological systems: a comprehensive approach to sustainable fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 19(5):853-873. https://doi. org/10.1111/faf.12296 · DOI
  41. Stephenson, R. L., M. Wiber, S. Paul, E. Angel, A. Benson, A. Charles, O. Chouinard, D. Edwards, P. Foley, D. Lane, J. McIsaac, B. Neis, C. Parlee, E. Pinkerton, M. Saunders, K. Squires, and R. U. Sumaila. 2018b. Integrating diverse objectives for sustainable fisheries in Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, in press. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2017-0345 · DOI
  42. Susskind, L. 2006. Can public policy dispute resolution meet the challenges set by deliberative democracy? Dispute Resolution Magazine 12(2):5-6.
  43. Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies 42 (11):1991-2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869 · DOI
  44. Takeda, L., and I. Røpke. 2010. Power and contestation in collaborative ecosystem-based management: the case of Haida Gwaii. Ecological Economics 70:178-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2010.02.007 · DOI
  45. Vifell, Å. C., and L. Soneryd. 2012. Organizing matters: how the "social dimension" gets lost in sustainability projects. Sustainable Development 20(1):18-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.461 · DOI
  46. Wiber, M. G. 2014. Syncopated rhythms? Temporal patterns in natural resource management. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 46(1):123-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/073291 13.2014.888906 · DOI
  47. Qualitative: survey; focus group; interview; public hearing; public inquiry; study; legal proceedings; media article
  48. Information Standards: allocation decisions include explicit trade-off analysis; decisions include risk assessment; peer review of science; knowledge of legal and regulatory framework; indicators are SMART; use of EBM approaches; application of Precautionary Approach; incorporation of local and traditional knowledge; multi-disciplinarity; MSE; Bayesian Decision Networks 77. Predictability Criteria: clearly established and communicated processes for decision making; following plain meaning of a process or provision; pursue process as it was intended by drafters; follow precedent

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Restoring Degraded Lands

    Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

    “Continuous, collaborative problem solving of multiscale decision-making that employs experimentation and conflict resolution has been shown to build capacity for resource self-management (135).”
    Background

Authors
Parlee, C. E., & Wiber, M. G.
Affiliations
University of New Brunswick (CA)
ORCID
Wiber, Melanie G.
Venue
Ecology and Society
Publisher
Resilience Alliance, Inc.
Published
2018
Volume
23
Issue
4
ISSN
1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5751/es-10334-230405
OpenAlex
W2896671456
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
ocean governance, risk management, conflict, marine environmental risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review