Sustainable food consumption: an overview of contemporary issues and policies
Open accessAbstract
Contemporary food production and consumption cannot be regarded as sustainable and raises problems with its wide scope involving diverse actors. Moreover, in the face of demographic change and a growing global population, sustainability problems arising from food systems will likely become more serious in the future. For example, agricultural production must deal with the impacts of climate change, increasingly challenging land-use conflicts, and rising health and social costs on both individual and societal levels. The unsustainability of current arrangements arises from the industrialization and globalization of agriculture and food processing, the shift of consumption patterns toward more dietary animal protein, the emergence of modern food styles that entail heavily processed products, the growing gap on a global scale between rich and poor, and the paradoxical lack of food security amid an abundance of food. These factors are attributable to national and international policies and regulations, as well as to prevalent business practices and, in particular, consumers’ values and habits. The most effective ways for affluent societies to reduce the environmental impact of their diets are to reduce consumption of meat and dairy products (especially beef), to favor organic fruits and vegetables, and to avoid goods that have been transported by air on both individual and institutional levels (e.g., public procurement, public catering). In examining the unsustainability of the current food system this article reviews the pertinent literature to derive a working definition of sustainable food consumption, outlines the major issues and impacts of current food-consumption practices, and discusses various policy interventions, including information-based instruments, market-based initiatives, direct regulations, and “nudges.” It concludes with a call for integrative, cross-sectoral, and population-wide policies that address the full range of drivers of unsustainable food production and consumption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Financial instruments are considered a powerful tool to shift consumption patterns towards more sustainable food practices.
“Financial instruments are considered a powerful tool to shift consumption patterns towards more sustainable food practices (Reisch et al., 2013).”
From Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications (2018) · cites this paper as Reisch et al., 2013
Cites
Strategies for Promoting Healthier Food Choices
Downs, J. S., Loewenstein, G., & Wisdom, J. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.159 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gözet, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
“Financial instruments are considered a powerful tool to shift consumption patterns towards more sustainable food practices (Reisch et al., 2013).”
BackgroundPriefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Bräutigam, K.-R. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.004 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Hansen, T., Sørensen, M. I., & Eriksen, M.-L. R. (2018) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.003 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Van Loo, E. J., Hoefkens, C., & Verbeke, W. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.001 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Stangherlin, I. D. C. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120749 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Qi, X., Yu, H., & Ploeger, A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17197106 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Aschemann-Witzel, J., Giménez, A., & Ares, G. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.002 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Household food waste-how to avoid it? An integrative review
van Geffen, L., van Herpen, E., & van Trijp, H. (2020) · Food Waste Management · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20561-4_2 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Consumer acceptance of food obtained from olive by-products: A survey of Italian consumers
Perito, M. A., Di Fonzo, A., Sansone, M., & Russo, C. (2019) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-03-2019-0197 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Addressing Sustainability within Public Procurement of Food: A Systematic Literature Review
Molin, E., Martin, M., & Björklund, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132313395 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Consumption-oriented policy instruments for fostering greenhouse gas mitigation
Grubb, M., Crawford-Brown, D., Neuhoff, K., Schanes, K., Hawkins, S., & Poncia, A. (2020) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1730151 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reisch, L., Eberle, U., & Lorek, S.
- Affiliations
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- CORSUS, Nernstweg 32-34, 22765 Hamburg, Germany
- Sustainable Europe Research Institute (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Reisch, Lucia
- Eberle, Ulrike
- Lorek, Sylvia
- Venue
- Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 7-25
- ISSN
- 1548-7733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W223747650
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 24.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sustainability Science Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
- CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Keywords
- sustainable food consumption, food systems, food policy, meat consumption, dietary protein, food processing, food security, climate change impacts on agriculture, land use conflicts, agricultural industrialization, food globalization, consumer behavior, environmental impact of diets, organic food, air cargo, public procurement, nudging, economic instruments, cross-sectoral policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review