Cited by 41Homelessness and Social IssuesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Examining provider perspectives within housing first and traditional programs

Open access
Henwood, Benjamin F., Shinn, Marybeth, Tsemberis, Sam, Padgett, Deborah K.·2013·American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Abstract

Pathways' Housing First represents a radical departure from traditional programs that serve individuals experiencing homelessness and co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders. This paper considered two federally funded comparison studies of Pathways' Housing First and traditional programs to examine whether differences were reflected in the perspectives of frontline providers. Both quantitative analysis of responses to structured questions with close-ended responses and qualitative analysis of open-ended responses to semistructured questions showed that Pathways providers had greater endorsement of consumer values, lesser endorsement of systems values, and greater tolerance for abnormal behavior that did not result in harm to others than their counterparts in traditional programs. Comparing provider perspectives also revealed an "implementation paradox"; traditional providers were inhibited from engaging consumers in treatment and services without housing, whereas HF providers could focus on issues other than securing housing. As programs increasingly adopt a Housing First approach, implementation challenges remain due to an existing workforce habituated to traditional services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15487768.2013.847745

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies found that Housing First's harm reduction philosophy fostered improved working relationships, as service users were not fearful of losing their housing if they disclosed substance use, allowing them to discuss the topic more freely with case managers.

    “Four studies found that Housing First's harm reduction philosophy fostered improved working relationships, as service users were not fearful of losing their housing if they disclosed substance use, allowing them to discuss the topic more freely with case managers (Andvig et al., 2018; Henwood et al., 2013; Watson et al., 2012; Tiderington et al., 2013).”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Henwood et al., 2013

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The flexibility also posed challenges for service providers, such as determining when to intervene and producing ambiguity about whether or not they were 'doing enough' to support tenants.

    “Yet, the flexibility also posed challenges for service providers, such as determining when to intervene and producing ambiguity about whether or not they were 'doing enough' to support tenants (Henwood et al., 2013, 2014; Tiderington et al., 2013).”

    From Harm reduction outcomes and practices in Housing First: A mixed-methods systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Henwood et al., 2013

    The Results (Acceptance versus Conformity; page not available) report that some Housing First providers felt inner tension about accepting consumer choice when consumers were not doing well. That supports the general claim that flexibility could be challenging, but our copy does not say providers struggled to decide when to intervene or questioned whether they were “doing enough.” (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Factors that affected working relationships and alliances included service providers' interpersonal style and level of patience, development and sustainment of appropriate boundaries, and unconditional positive regard and acceptance of tenants.

    “Factors that affected working relationships and alliances included service providers' interpersonal style and level of patience (Collins et al., 2012a; Tiderington et al., 2013), development and sustainment of appropriate boundaries (Collins et al., 2012a), and unconditional positive regard and acceptance of tenants (Collins et al., 2012a; Henwood et al., 2013).”
  • TF service providers were less accepting of deviant behaviours, wanting tenants to conform to housing program expectations.

    “TF service providers were less accepting of deviant behaviours, wanting tenants to conform to housing program expectations”
  • Adoption of a harm reduction model enables HF tenants to be accepted as they are, which is instrumental to building strong working relationships.

    “Adoption of a harm reduction model enables HF tenants to be accepted as they are, which is instrumental to building strong working relationships”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henwood, B. F., Shinn, M., Tsemberis, S., & Padgett, D. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Pathways to Housing (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Published
2013-10
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
262-274
ISSN
  • 1548-7768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7776
OpenAlex
W2101651727
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH069865, F31MH083372)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
Housing First, homelessness, provider perspectives, consumer values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review