The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antiracist Pedagogy: Definition, Theory, and Professional Development
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to define Antiracist Pedagogy and establish it within the sociological framework of Critical Theory. Antiracist Pedagogy is a paradigm located within Critical Theory utilized to explain and counteract the persistence and impact of racism. This paper indicates the need for the establishment of Antiracist Pedagogy within the school curriculum as well as the necessary professional development required to implement Antiracist Pedagogy effectively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Educators devote years of study to antiracist and feminist pedagogies, and they view teaching and mentoring as ongoing processes.
“Educators devote years of study to antiracist and feminist pedagogies, and they view teaching and mentoring as ongoing processes (Blakeney 2005).”
From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Blakeney 2005
Antiracist and feminist pedagogies require faculty to continually examine their position of power in relation to their students as well as the way it impacts their mentoring.
“Importantly, antiracist and feminist pedagogies require faculty to continually examine their position of power in relation to their students as well as the way it impacts their mentoring (Blakeney 2005:126-127;Hanna 2019;Kishimoto 2015).”
From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Blakeney 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.4324/9780203241219 · DOI
- Apple M. W., 2000, Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age.
- Brown Y., 2002, A framework for thinking about racism as an equity issue.
- Carter R. T., 1994, Review of research in education., 291
- Dewey J., 1987, The later works, 1925–1953
- Dilg M., 1999, Race and culture in the classroom: Teaching and learning through multicultural education.
- Freire P., 1994, Education for Critical Consciousness.
- Freire P., 2000, Pedagogy of the oppressed.
- Giroux H. A., 1983, Theory and resistance in education.
- Giroux H. A., 1992, Border crossings.
- Irvine J. J., 1991, Black students and school failure: policies, practices, and prescriptions.
- Irvine J. J., 1992, Diversity in teacher education, 79
- Kailin J., 2002, Antiracist education: From theory to practice.
- Ladson-Billings G., 1994, The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of african american children.
- Lawrence S. M., 1997, Teachers College Record, 99, 162, 10.1177/016146819709900101 · DOI
- Rosenberg P. M., 1998, Being responsive to cultural differences: How teachers learn., 3
- Sleeter C., 2002, Critical pedagogy, critical race theory, and antiracist education: Implications for multicultural education
- Tatum B. D., 1999, “Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?”: and other conversations about race.
- Thompson A., 2002, Passion and pedagogy: relation, creation, and transformation in teaching, 431
- Wiles D., 2001, Freedom summer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter
Flewellen, A. O., Dunnavant, J. P., Odewale, A., Jones, A., Wolde-Michael, T., Crossland, Z., & Franklin, M. (2021) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2021.18 · Cited by 151
Ward, C., Blanchet Garneau, A., Lavoie, P., Smylie, D., Petiquay-Dufresne, J., Nepton, C., & Bélisle, M. (2025) · Santé Publique · doi:10.3917/spub.251.0059 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Blakeney, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-132
- ISSN
- 1550-5170
- 2156-8154
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
