Flipping the Classroom and Student Performance in Advanced Statistics: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment
Open accessAbstract
I administer a quasi-experiment using undergraduate political science majors in statistics classes to evaluate whether “flipping the classroom” (the treatment) alters students’ applied problem-solving performance and satisfaction relative to students in a traditional classroom environment (the control). I also assess whether general student characteristics such as when and where students took the prerequisite course, grade point average (GPA), and gender influence performance. I find flipping the classroom gives students statistically significant advantages in difficult, applied areas emphasized in class. Furthermore, students in the flipped classroom feel they learned more and enjoyed the course more than those in a traditional classroom. I argue students’ affective preference for a flipped classroom is important for student motivation, recollection, and future use of quantitative data analysis. Flipping the classroom entails high start-up costs, but it can merit implementing to improve both effective and affective instructional outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flipped classroom requires the use of technology and may be a problem for teachers and students who do not have the necessary facilities and competencies.
“FC is the first and foremost method that requires the use of technology and may be a problem for teachers and students who do not have the necessary facilities and competencies (Touchton, 2015; Tully, 2014).”
From Mapping the First Twenty Years of the Flipped Classroom Model in Primary School Education: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Touchton, 2015
Cites
From sage on the stage to guide on the side
King, A. (1993) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.1993.9926781 · Cited by 1,462 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ağırman, N., & Ercoşkun, M. H. (2025) · lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.26822/iejee.2025.410
- Authors
- Touchton, M.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Touchton, Michael
- ORCID
- Touchton, Michael
- Venue
- Journal of Political Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-44
- ISSN
- 1551-2169 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2177
- OpenAlex
- W2026750475
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 71.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Political Science Education (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, student performance, student satisfaction, real-world problem solving, student motivation, gender differences, grade point average, teaching methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review