Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication

Enke, Nadja, Borchers, Nils S.·2019·International Journal of Strategic Communication

Abstract

Strategic social media influencer communication has become a major topic in strategic communication. However, despite the growing relevance of this new strategic communication instrument, research has paid only limited attention to elaborating its basic concepts. In this article, we adopt a strategic communication perspective to develop a conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. Particularly, we draw on research findings that identify the external resources social media influencers contribute to organization-influencer cooperation. We use these findings to systematically develop functional definitions of social media influencers and of strategic social media influencer communication. We define social media influencers as third-party actors who have established a significant number of relevant relationships with a specific quality to and influence on organizational stakeholders through content production, content distribution, interaction, and personal appearance on the social web. Subsequently, we define strategic social media communication as the purposeful use of communication by organizations or social media influencers in which social media influencers are addressed or perform activities with strategic significance to organizational goals. We then situate these definitions within the broader framework of strategic communication by discussing related concepts and by describing the strategic action field that has emerged around strategic social media influencer communication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1553118x.2019.1620234

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Abidin C., 2015, Ada: a Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology, 8
  2. 10.1007/978-3-658-06198-2 · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-06198-2
  3. 10.1086/287675 · doi:10.1086/287675
  4. Hearn A., 2011, Ephemera, 10, 421
  5. Jerslev A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10
  6. Keller A., 2006, Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie
  7. Krömer, L., Borchers, N. S. & Enke, N. (2018). Own the Follower: Wie lassen sich Influencer erfolgreich in den eigenen Unternehmenskanal einbinden? Eine Untersuchung anhand der YouTube-Kanäle deutscher Beauty-Unternehmen. In A. Schach & T. Lommatzsch (Eds.), Influencer Relations: Marketing und PR mit digitalen Meinungsführern (pp. 107–128). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
  8. Lommatzsch, T. (2018). Begriffsklärung: Influencer Marketing vs. Influencer Relations. In A. Schach & T. Lommatzsch (Eds.), Influencer Relations: Marketing und PR mit digitalen Meinungsführern (pp. 23–26). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  9. Macnamara J., 2018, Evaluating public communication: Exploring new models, standards, and best practice
  10. Mansell R., 2015, Intermedia, 43, 20
  11. 10.1007/978-3-658-21188-2_18 · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21188-2_18
  12. 10.1002/cb.v14.2 · doi:10.1002/cb.v14.2
  13. Schach, A. (2018). Von Two-Step-Flow bis Influencer Relations: Die Entwicklung der Kommunikation mit Meinungsführern. In A. Schach & T. Lommatzsch (Eds.), Influencer Relations: Marketing und PR mit digitalen Meinungsführern (pp. 3– 22). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21188-2
  14. Senft T. M., 2008, Camgirls: Celebrity & community in the age of social networks
  15. Solis B., 2009, Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR
  16. Stacks D. W., 2013, Dictionary of public relations measurement and research
  17. 10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_5
  18. Zerfass A., 2016, European communication monitor 2016: Exploring trends in big data, stakeholder engagement and strategic communication: Results of a survey in 43 countries

Metadata

Authors
Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S.
Venue
International Journal of Strategic Communication
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
261-277
ISSN
  • 1553-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-1198
OpenAlex
W2972302364
Cited by
485
References
41
FWCI
81.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1620234
The paper
Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1620234

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.