The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication
Abstract
Strategic social media influencer communication has become a major topic in strategic communication. However, despite the growing relevance of this new strategic communication instrument, research has paid only limited attention to elaborating its basic concepts. In this article, we adopt a strategic communication perspective to develop a conceptual framework for strategic social media influencer communication. Particularly, we draw on research findings that identify the external resources social media influencers contribute to organization-influencer cooperation. We use these findings to systematically develop functional definitions of social media influencers and of strategic social media influencer communication. We define social media influencers as third-party actors who have established a significant number of relevant relationships with a specific quality to and influence on organizational stakeholders through content production, content distribution, interaction, and personal appearance on the social web. Subsequently, we define strategic social media communication as the purposeful use of communication by organizations or social media influencers in which social media influencers are addressed or perform activities with strategic significance to organizational goals. We then situate these definitions within the broader framework of strategic communication by discussing related concepts and by describing the strategic action field that has emerged around strategic social media influencer communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
Freeman, R. E. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139192675 · Cited by 4,494
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2010.495581 · Cited by 2,755 · cited 1×
“SMIs fulfill the functions of “secondary stakeholders” (Freeman, Harrison, Wicks, Parmar, & de Colle, 2010, p. 24) that have the ability to influence “primary stakeholders” (Freeman et al., 2010, p. 24) of organizations such as consumers or citizens.”
BackgroundThe Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media
van Dijck, J. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 · Cited by 2,688
Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815768 · Cited by 2,634
Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications
Willigan, W. L., Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1956) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3708755 · Cited by 2,157
The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6579 · Cited by 2,140
Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications
Roshwalb, I., Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1956) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1247718 · Cited by 1,880
Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009 · Cited by 1,756
Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of Social Media Influencers
Khamis, S., Ang, L., & Welling, R. (2017) · Celebrity Studies · doi:10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292 · Cited by 1,505
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Abidin C., 2015, Ada: a Journal of Gender, New Media, & Technology, 8
- 10.1007/978-3-658-06198-2 · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-06198-2
- 10.1086/287675 · doi:10.1086/287675
- Hearn A., 2011, Ephemera, 10, 421
- Jerslev A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10
- Keller A., 2006, Allgemeine Erkenntnistheorie
- Krömer, L., Borchers, N. S. & Enke, N. (2018). Own the Follower: Wie lassen sich Influencer erfolgreich in den eigenen Unternehmenskanal einbinden? Eine Untersuchung anhand der YouTube-Kanäle deutscher Beauty-Unternehmen. In A. Schach & T. Lommatzsch (Eds.), Influencer Relations: Marketing und PR mit digitalen Meinungsführern (pp. 107–128). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
- Lommatzsch, T. (2018). Begriffsklärung: Influencer Marketing vs. Influencer Relations. In A. Schach & T. Lommatzsch (Eds.), Influencer Relations: Marketing und PR mit digitalen Meinungsführern (pp. 23–26). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
- Macnamara J., 2018, Evaluating public communication: Exploring new models, standards, and best practice
- Mansell R., 2015, Intermedia, 43, 20
- 10.1007/978-3-658-21188-2_18 · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21188-2_18
- 10.1002/cb.v14.2 · doi:10.1002/cb.v14.2
- Schach, A. (2018). Von Two-Step-Flow bis Influencer Relations: Die Entwicklung der Kommunikation mit Meinungsführern. In A. Schach & T. Lommatzsch (Eds.), Influencer Relations: Marketing und PR mit digitalen Meinungsführern (pp. 3– 22). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-21188-2
- Senft T. M., 2008, Camgirls: Celebrity & community in the age of social networks
- Solis B., 2009, Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR
- Stacks D. W., 2013, Dictionary of public relations measurement and research
- 10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_5
- Zerfass A., 2016, European communication monitor 2016: Exploring trends in big data, stakeholder engagement and strategic communication: Results of a survey in 43 countries
Cited by
Hudders, L., De Jans, S., & De Veirman, M. (2021) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2020.1836925 · Cited by 685
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781 · Cited by 671
Hudders, L., & De Jans, S. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1997455 · Cited by 200
Zhou, S., Blazquez, M., McCormick, H., & Barnes, L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.011 · Cited by 181
Who do you trust? The digital destruction of shared situational awareness and the COVID-19 infodemic
Bunker, D. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102201 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Strategic Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-277
- ISSN
- 1553-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-1198
- OpenAlex
- W2972302364
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 81.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1620234
- The paper
- Enke, N., & Borchers, N. S. (2019). Social Media Influencers in Strategic Communication: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Social Media Influencer Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2019.1620234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.