Cited by 17Gender, Feminism, and MediaImpact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

TikTok and Child Hypersexualization: Analysis of Videos and Narratives of Minors

Open access
Soriano-Ayala, Encarnación, Bonillo Díaz, María, Cala, Verónica C.·2023·American Journal of Sexuality Education

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the degree of sexualization observed in TikTok videos and to compare it with the narratives of young people about the social network. A mixed-methods research design was used combining (1) a quantitative observational study based on measuring indicators of sexualization in 648 videos published by the 12 TikTokers most followed in Spain and (2) a qualitative study with 12 in-depth interviews to TikTok users (6 male, 6 female) between 8 and 17 years old from Spain. The video analysis reveal hypersexualized behaviors in 10/12 accounts, without statistically significant gender differences. Narratives about the social network showed ambivalent ideas, considering it a fundamental space for fun and socialization while being aware of numerous risks and threats. Sexualization is described with the expression “being loose” and is recognized as an intrinsic characteristic of the network. The discourses on hypersexualization are markedly gendered, recognizing sexualization almost exclusively in women. Some young people perceive self-sexualization as a form of self-empowerment, while when they describe it in other women, it is penalized and negatively valued as a form of objectification that favors bullying. They also warn about its impact on self-esteem and mental health, especially in terms of those bodies that do not fit into body hierarchies. The climate of the network facilitates criticism and insult, the dissociation between the real and virtual self, and that public exposure increases their vulnerability. It is urgent to advance digital affective-sexual education that addresses these problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15546128.2022.2096734

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soriano-Ayala, E., Bonillo Díaz, M., & Cala, V. C.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Almeria, Almeria, Spain
  • University of Almería (ES)
Corresponding author
Cala, Verónica C.
Venue
American Journal of Sexuality Education
Published
2022-07-13
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
210-230
ISSN
  • 1554-6128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6136
OpenAlex
W4285085645
Cited by
17
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • American Journal of Sexuality Education (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio de Patentes de la Universidad de Almería (Universidad de Almería) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministry of Economic Affairs (RTI2018-101668-B-I00)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
TikTok, child sexualization, hypersexualization, minors, social media, self-sexualization, objectification, bullying, self-esteem, body image, mental health, online risks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review