Cited by 33Autophagy in Disease and TherapyAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

TARDBP/TDP-43 regulates autophagy in both MTORC1-dependent and MTORC1-independent manners

Open access
Ying, Zheng, Xia, Qin, Hao, Zongbing, Xu, Delai, Wang, Mingmei, Wang, Hongfeng, Wang, Guanghui·2016·Autophagy

Abstract

In a recent paper we addressed the mechanism by which defective autophagy contributes to TARDBP/TDP-43-mediated neurodegenerative disorders. We demonstrated that TARDBP regulates MTORC1-TFEB signaling by targeting RPTOR/raptor, a key component and an adaptor protein of MTORC1. Loss of TARDBP decreased the mRNA stability of RPTOR and this regulation in turn enhanced autophagosomal and lysosomal biogenesis in an MTORC1-dependent manner. Meanwhile, loss of TARDBP could also impair autophagosome-lysosome fusion in an MTORC1-independent manner. Importantly, we found that modulation of MTOR activity by treatment with rapamycin and phosphatidic acid had strong effects on the neurodegenerative phenotypes of TBPH (Drosophila TARDBP)-depleted flies. Taken together, our data reveal that multiple dysfunctions in the autophagic process contribute to TARDBP-linked neurodegeneration and may help to identify potential therapeutic targets in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15548627.2016.1151596

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ying, Z., Xia, Q., Hao, Z., Xu, D., Wang, M., Wang, H., & Wang, G.
Affiliations
Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Hongfeng
  • Wang, Guanghui
Venue
Autophagy
Published
2016-04-02
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
707-708
ISSN
  • 1554-8627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8635
OpenAlex
W2316895002
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autophagy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
TARDBP, TDP-43, mTORC1, RPTOR, raptors, mRNA stability, autophagosome-lysosome fusion, lysosomal biogenesis, neurodegeneration, Drosophila, rapamycin, phosphatidic acid, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Animals, Autophagy, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Lysosomes, Phagosomes, Signal Transduction, Multiprotein Complexes, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review