Cited by 88Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyMaritime and Coastal Archaeology

Islands Under the Sea: A Review of Early Modern Human Dispersal Routes and Migration Hypotheses Through Wallacea

Kealy, Shimona, Louys, Julien, O’Connor, Sue·2016·Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology

Abstract

Wallacea is the transitional biogeographic zone between the continents of Sunda (Southeast Asia) and Sahul (Australian-New Guinea). It consists of a series of island chains unique in the region for never having been connected to either continent. Movement of early modern humans from Sunda to Sahul during the late Pleistocene required dispersal through Wallacea, and hence would have necessitated sea crossings. However, the archeological evidence for early modern humans in Wallacea is still a work in progress, and none of it pre-dates the archeological record from Sahul. While numerous models of this significant colonization event have been proposed, selecting the most likely model for first landfall in Sahul using current archeological evidence has proven difficult, if not impossible. Here the late Pleistocene archeological evidence of early modern humans from Wallacea and its neighbors are reviewed, and the key colonization models that have been proposed are explored. We consider the use of computer simulations and the input variables necessary to test the likelihood of the different colonization models. We highlight the importance of the greater than 100 additional submerged islands observed within the Wallacean archipelago following a simple analysis of bathymetric data and sea-level curves, and their potential impacts on the dispersal and ecology of early human colonizers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15564894.2015.1119218

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first anatomically modern human populations to arrive in Island Southeast Asia most likely encountered a variety of hominin populations, no matter which route they took to enter Sahul.

    “Nonetheless, the current fossil and archaeological records, together mounting genetic evidence from across ISEA, point to the widespread presence of archaic hominins east of Wallace's Line 26 , and indicate that the first AMH populations to arrive in ISEA most likely encountered a variety of hominin populations, no matter which route they took to enter Sahul 4752 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kealy, S., Louys, J., & O’Connor, S.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology
Published
2015-12-21
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
364-384
ISSN
  • 1556-1828 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4894
OpenAlex
W2198842286
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
33.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Keywords
Wallacea, early modern human dispersal, Sunda, sea crossing, Late Pleistocene, colonization models, sea-level change, bathymetry, biogeography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review