The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of the systematics of the Sordariomycetes based on a four-gene phylogeny
Abstract
The Sordariomycetes is one of the largest classes in the Ascomycota, and the majority of its species are characterized by perithecial ascomata and inoperculate unitunicate asci. It includes more than 600 genera with over 3000 species and represents a wide range of ecologies including pathogens and endophytes of plants, animal pathogens and mycoparasites. To test and refine the classification of the Sordariomycetes sensu Eriksson (2006), the phylogenetic relationship among 106 taxa from 12 orders out of 16 in the Sordariomycetes was investigated based on four nuclear loci (nSSU and nLSU rDNA, TEF and RPB2), using three species of the Leotiomycetes as outgroups. Three subclasses (i.e. Hypocreomycetidae, Sordariomycetidae and Xylariomycetidae) currently recognized in the classification are well supported with the placement of the Lulworthiales in either a basal group of the Sordariomycetes or a sister group of the Hypocreomycetidae. Except for the Microascales, our results recognize most of the orders as monophyletic groups. Melanospora species form a clade outside of the Hypocreales and are recognized as a distinct order in the Hypocreomycetidae. Glomerellaceae is excluded from the Phyllachorales and placed in Hypocreomycetidae incertae sedis. In the Sordariomycetidae, the Sordariales is a strongly supported clade and occurs within a well supported clade containing the Boliniales and Chaetosphaeriales. Aspects of morphology, ecology and evolution are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood
Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2003) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150390235520 · Cited by 16,806
Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts
Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Lorito, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro797 · Cited by 4,019
Ainsworth and Bisbys Dictionary of the Fungi
(2008) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851998268.0000 · Cited by 2,202
Testing for Phylogenetic Conflict Among Molecular Data Sets in the Tribe Triticeae (Gramineae)
Mason-Gamer, R. J., & Kellogg, E. A. (1996) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/45.4.524 · Cited by 820
Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits
Lutzoni, F., Kauff, F., Cox, C. J., McLaughlin, D., Celio, G., Dentinger, B., Padamsee, M., Hibbett, D., James, T. Y., Baloch, E., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1446 · Cited by 816
Self-citationMarine-derived fungi: a chemically and biologically diverse group of microorganisms
Bugni, T. S., & Ireland, C. M. (2004) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/b301926h · Cited by 760
Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · Cited by 489
Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity
Wingfield, M. J., Seifert, K. A., & Webber, J. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 475
Self-citation
Cited by
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi
Hibbett, D. S., Binder, M., Bischoff, J. F., Blackwell, M., Cannon, P. F., Eriksson, O. E., Huhndorf, S., James, T., Kirk, P. M., Lücking, R., et al. (2007) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004 · Cited by 2,390
Self-citationThe Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Lane, C. E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S. S., Brown, M. W., Burki, F., Dunthorn, M., Hampl, V., et al. (2012) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Cited by 1,680
Self-citationMartinez, D., Berka, R. M., Henrissat, B., Saloheimo, M., Arvas, M., Baker, S. E., Chapman, J., Chertkov, O., Coutinho, P. M., Cullen, D., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1403 · Cited by 1,240
Self-citationColletotrichum – current status and future directions
Cannon, P. F., Damm, U., Johnston, P. R., & Weir, B. S. (2012) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim0014 · Cited by 1,105
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, N., Castlebury, L. A., Miller, A. N., Huhndorf, S. M., Schoch, C. L., Seifert, K. A., Rossman, A. Y., Rogers, J. D., Kohlmeyer, J., Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B., & Sung, G.-H.
- Venue
- Mycologia
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1076-1087
- ISSN
- 0027-5514 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-2536
- OpenAlex
- W2149184690
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of the systematics of the Sordariomycetes based on a four-gene phylogeny. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832635
- The paper
- Zhang, N., Castlebury, L. A., Miller, A. N., Huhndorf, S. M., Schoch, C. L., Seifert, K. A., Rossman, A. Y., Rogers, J. D., Kohlmeyer, J., Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B., & Sung, G.-H. (2006). An overview of the systematics of the Sordariomycetes based on a four-gene phylogeny. Mycologia. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
