Co-design as a metagovernance strategy for complex problems in local governments
Abstract
Co-design is increasingly recognised as a promising approach to addressing complex problems in the public sector. However, empirical research on its value within the public sector beyond the use of co-design within projects remains limited. Against this backdrop, this study focuses on embedded, long-term co-design practices, and examines how such practices evolve within three local government organisations. We found that co-design practices in the early years were characterised by the organic co-evolution of problem understanding, new intervention ideas, and stakeholder relationships throughout the long-term design process, whereas in later years, more strategic approaches emerged in their co-design practices — with explicit aims for systems change, supported by enabling arrangements such as multi-level systems change plans, structured stakeholder networks, and structures to support stakeholder learning and feedback. With these findings, we discuss that embedded, long-term co-design practices in government can function as a meta-governance strategy for shaping and managing collaborative governance to address complex problems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30
- Authors
- Kim, A., & Mulder, I.
- Affiliations
- Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Ahmee
- Venue
- CoDesign
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-02-25
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1571-0882 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3755
- OpenAlex
- W7133640480
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CoDesign (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- co-design, meta-governance, local government, complex problems, collaborative governance, systemic change, stakeholder engagement, multi-level governance, stakeholder learning, public sector innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review