Cited by 0Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

Co-design as a metagovernance strategy for complex problems in local governments

Kim, Ahmee, Mulder, Ingrid·2026·CoDesign

Abstract

Co-design is increasingly recognised as a promising approach to addressing complex problems in the public sector. However, empirical research on its value within the public sector beyond the use of co-design within projects remains limited. Against this backdrop, this study focuses on embedded, long-term co-design practices, and examines how such practices evolve within three local government organisations. We found that co-design practices in the early years were characterised by the organic co-evolution of problem understanding, new intervention ideas, and stakeholder relationships throughout the long-term design process, whereas in later years, more strategic approaches emerged in their co-design practices — with explicit aims for systems change, supported by enabling arrangements such as multi-level systems change plans, structured stakeholder networks, and structures to support stakeholder learning and feedback. With these findings, we discuss that embedded, long-term co-design practices in government can function as a meta-governance strategy for shaping and managing collaborative governance to address complex problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15710882.2026.2635482

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30

Authors
Kim, A., & Mulder, I.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Kim, Ahmee
Venue
CoDesign
Published
2026-02-25
Pages
1-15
ISSN
  • 1571-0882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3755
OpenAlex
W7133640480
Cited by
0
References
30
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CoDesign (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
co-design, meta-governance, local government, complex problems, collaborative governance, systemic change, stakeholder engagement, multi-level governance, stakeholder learning, public sector innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review