Cited by 30Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Planning and Landscape DesignUrban Heat Island Mitigation

Stormwater management challenges as revealed through a design experiment with professional landscape architects

Backhaus, Antje, Dam, Torben, Jensen, Marina Bergen·2012·Urban Water Journal

Abstract

Despite a number of potential benefits, using the urban landscape for managing stormwater runoff is spreading rather slowly. As urban planners and landscape architects are considered key protagonists of this trend, the objective of the study was to identify the challenges they confront when asked to retrofit an urban landscape for the management of stormwater runoff. Monitoring a two-week design experiment involving six teams of professional landscape architects identified 11 challenges, including sizing of elements, estimating costs, understanding water dynamics, aspects of biodiversity promotion, and dealing with land administrations and ownership issues. Measures to address the challenges are discussed. It should be noted that all six teams approached the stormwater management challenge in an energetic and focused way, applying their technical, personal and site-specific knowledge, and delivered innovative, flexible and coherent solutions. This emphasizes that the design process constitutes a strong and unique problem solving tool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1573062x.2011.633613

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The central challenge is regulating a diffuse, nonpoint source of pollution (stormwater) using local authority, with little control over large portions of the stormwater source (private properties), and limited funding to implement actions.

    “The central challenge is regulating a diffuse, nonpoint source of pollution (i.e., stormwater) using local authority, with little control over large portions of the stormwater source (i.e., private properties), and limited funding to implement actions (Backhaus et al. 2012;Dhakal and Chevalier 2016;Subramanian 2016).”
  • Small-scale projects may be the better alternatives to large projects that must overcome limited space and uncooperative landowners, particularly in areas with no opportunity to retrofit pre-existing stormwater management structures.

    “Small-scale projects may be the better alternatives to large projects that must overcome limited space and uncooperative landowners (Backhaus et al. 2012;Malinowski et al. 2018;Woznicki et al. 2018), particularly in areas with no opportunity to retrofit pre-existing stormwater management structures.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Backhaus, A., Dam, T., & Jensen, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Backhaus, Antje
Venue
Urban Water Journal
Published
2012-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
29-43
ISSN
  • 1573-062X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-9006
OpenAlex
W2002053656
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urban Water Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Keywords
stormwater management, urban landscape, landscape architects, design experiments, retrofitting, design process, professional challenges, cost estimation, biodiversity, land ownership, water dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review