CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsUrban Heat Island MitigationUrban Arborization and Environmental Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Green infrastructure performance in arid and semi-arid urban environments

Meerow, Sara, Natarajan, Mukunth, Krantz, David·2021·Urban Water Journal
DOI 10.1080/1573062x.2021.1877741
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Urbanization can negatively affect residents’ health and wellbeing. Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) is increasingly advocated as a win-win strategy for addressing multiple urban problems. Literature quantifying GSI benefits is growing, but it is unclear how it performs in arid and semi-arid cities. This study, co-designed with practitioner partners in Phoenix, Arizona, evaluates the current state of knowledge on GSI performance with respect to hydrologic, water quality, urban heat, and air quality benefits. Our systematic literature review confirms a lack of research quantifying GSI performance in arid and semi-arid cities. Our findings, which we summarize in the paper and present in a searchable, online database, suggest that GSI is beneficial in mitigating runoff, urban heat, and air pollution in the surrounding area to some degree. Results for water quality are more mixed. This points to the need for more GSI monitoring and research, especially of air and water quality benefits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1573062x.2021.1877741

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.014 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2 · DOI
  3. Archambault É., 2010, World Social Science Report Knowledge: Knowledge Divides, 251
  4. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.417 · DOI
  5. Benedict M. A., 2002, Renewable Resources Journal, 20, 12
  6. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.027 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000. Low Impact Development (LID): A Literature Review . Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water. EPA-841-B-00-005.
  10. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.441 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s12273-018-0463-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.044 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1061/41099(367)122 · DOI
  17. 10.1061/9780784479322.020 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042 · DOI
  19. 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00027 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.008 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00678.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.007 · DOI
  23. 10.1890/10-1493.1 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/environments2020221 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.046 · DOI
  26. 10.3390/f9070439 · DOI
  27. 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.014 · DOI
  29. 10.2175/106143013X13789303501920 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/w9080561 · DOI
  31. Lodhi A. R., 2014, Water Science and Engineering, 7, 155
  32. 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.023 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102621 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.010 · DOI
  35. Murphy M. T., 1999, WRPMD 1999: Preparing for the 21st Century
  36. Nehrke S., 2004, Urban Drainage 2002, 30, 2221
  37. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb00797.x · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/s00267-016-0741-z · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.02.001 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/joc.2177 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.069 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/jawr.12038 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/aws2.1123 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.005 · DOI
  47. Taylor S., 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, 323
  48. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.038 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.014 · DOI
  51. 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000770 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.022 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.1817561116 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Meerow, S., Natarajan, M., & Krantz, D.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Meerow, Sara
ORCID
Venue
Urban Water Journal
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
275-285
ISSN
  • 1573-062X (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-9006
DOI
10.1080/1573062x.2021.1877741
OpenAlex
W3128965510
Cited by
59
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Urban Water Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Knowledge Exchange for Resilience at Arizona State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
Keywords
green stormwater infrastructure, urbanization, stormwater runoff mitigation, urban heat, air pollution, water quality, Phoenix, Arizona

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review