Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GUIDELINES TO STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF DATA FROM RATING SCALES AND QUESTIONNAIRES

Open access
Svensson, Elisabeth·2001·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

Questionnaires and rating scales are commonly used to measure qualitative variables, such as feelings, attitudes and many other behavioural and health-related variables. There are different types of instruments ranging from single scales to multi-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/165019701300006542

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Svensson, E.
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2001-01-21
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
47-48
ISSN
1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068531129
Cited by
306
References
17
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GUIDELINES TO STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF DATA FROM RATING SCALES AND QUESTIONNAIRES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/165019701300006542
The paper
Svensson, E. (2001). GUIDELINES TO STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF DATA FROM RATING SCALES AND QUESTIONNAIRES. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/165019701300006542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.