The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Outcome research seeks to understand the end results of health services. Researchers use a wide variety of outcome measures including technical, clinical and patient-oriented measures. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a common reference framework for functioning may contribute to improved outcome research. The objective of this paper is to provide an updated version of the linking rules published in 2002 and illustrate how these rules are applied to link technical and clinical measures, health-status measures and interventions to the ICF. RESULTS: Three specific linking rules have been established to link health-status measures to the ICF and one specific linking rule has been created to link technical and clinical measures and interventions. A total of 8 linking rules have been established for use with all different outcome measures and with interventions. CONCLUSION: The newly updated linking rules will allow researchers systematically to link and compare meaningful concepts contained in them. This should prove extremely useful in selecting the most appropriate outcome measures among a number of candidate measures for the applied interventions. Further possible applications are the operationalization of concrete ICF categories using specific measures or the creation of ICF category-based item bankings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Cited by
Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., & Prodinger, B. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258 · Cited by 594
Self-citationHuber, M., van Vliet, M., Giezenberg, M., Winkens, B., Heerkens, Y., Dagnelie, P. C., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010091 · Cited by 552
What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF
Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., & Davidson, B. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.508530 · Cited by 443
Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Cieza, A., Sandborn, W. J., Coenen, M., Chowers, Y., Hibi, T., Kostanjsek, N., Stucki, G., Colombel, J.-F., & the International Programme to Develop New Indexes for Crohn's Disease (IPNIC) group* (2012) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300049 · Cited by 346
Self-citationFactors impacting employment for people with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review
Scott, M., Milbourn, B., Falkmer, M., Black, M., Bӧlte, S., Halladay, A., Lerner, M., Taylor, J. L., & Girdler, S. (2019) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361318787789 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Üstün, B., & Stucki, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- Publisher
- Medical Journals Sweden AB
- Published
- 2005-07-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 212-218
- ISSN
- 1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119889041
- Cited by
- 1,304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 68.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/16501970510040263
- The paper
- Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Üstün, B., & Stucki, G. (2005). ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.