The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information
Abstract
Purpose The content of and methods for collecting health information often vary across settings and challenge the comparability of health information across time, individuals or populations. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) contains an exhaustive set of categories of information which constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Methods and results In two earlier papers, we have proposed rules for linking existing health information to the ICF. Further refinements to these existing ICF Linking Rules are presented in this paper to enhance the transparency of the linking process. The refinements involve preparing information for linking, perspectives from which information is collected and the categorization of response options. Issues regarding the linking of information not covered or unspecified within the ICF are also revisited in this paper. Conclusion: The ICF Linking Rules are valuable for enhancing comparability of health information to ensure that information is available in a consistent manner to serve as a foundation for evidence-based decision-making across all levels of health systems. The refinements presented in this paper enhance transparency in, and ultimately reliability of the process of, linking health information to the ICF. Implications for Rehabilitation The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) constitutes a unified and consistent language of human functioning suitable as a reference for comparing health information. Comparability of information is essential to ensure that the widest range of information is available in a consistent manner for any decision-maker at all levels of the health system. The refined ICF Linking Rules presented in this article outline the method to establish comparability of health information based on the ICF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
World Health Organization (2021) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t76403-000 · Cited by 3,751
The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)
Kerns, R. D., Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1985) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1 · Cited by 2,128 · cited 1×
“The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory [7] asks to rate the pain at the present moment from 0 ‘‘No pain’’ to 6 ‘‘Very intense pain’’.”
ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned
Cieza, A., Geyh, S., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Üstün, B., & Stucki, G. (2005) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501970510040263 · Cited by 1,304
Self-citationThe Work Limitations Questionnaire
Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., Rogers, W. H., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K., & Cynn, D. (2001) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200101000-00009 · Cited by 971
Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism.
Murray, C. J. L., & EVANS, D. B. (2003) · Cited by 855
Cieza, A., Brockow, T., Ewert, T., Amman, E., Kollerits, B., Chatterji, S., ÜstÜn, T. B., & Stucki, G. (2002) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/165019702760279189 · Cited by 854
Self-citationSteiner, W. A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D., Aeschlimann, A., & Stucki, G. (2002) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/82.11.1098 · Cited by 457
Validation of the German Version of the Brief Pain Inventory
Radbruch, L., Loick, G., Kiencke, P., Lindena, G., Sabatowski, R., Grond, S., Lehmann, K. A., & Cleeland, C. S. (1999) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00064-0 · Cited by 362
Cerniauskaite, M., Quintas, R., Boldt, C., Raggi, A., Cieza, A., Bickenbach, J. E., & Leonardi, M. (2011) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.529235 · Cited by 289
Self-citationCoenen, M., Stamm, T. A., Stucki, G., & Cieza, A. (2012) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9943-2 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- WHO, 2013, WHO quality of life
- van Buuren S, 2005, J Off Stat, 21, 53
- 10.1080/09638280400014071 · doi:10.1080/09638280400014071
- 10.1080/16501960410015443 · doi:10.1080/16501960410015443
- 10.1177/000841740707405S06 · doi:10.1177/000841740707405s06
- 10.1179/2056607715Y.0000000003 · doi:10.1179/2056607715y.0000000003
- WHO, 2013, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS2.0)
Cited by
Nevala, N., Pehkonen, I., Teittinen, A., Vesala, H. T., Pörtfors, P., & Anttila, H. (2019) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-019-09837-2 · Cited by 89
Lundin, K., Mahdi, S., Isaksson, J., & Bölte, S. (2021) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361320975311 · Cited by 39
Fridell, A., Norrman, H. N., Girke, L., & Bölte, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031268 · Cited by 31
Demes, J. S., McNair, B., & Taylor, M. R. G. (2020) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.61837 · Cited by 30
Blas, A. J. T., Beltran, K. M. B., Martinez, P. G. V., & Yao, D. P. G. (2018) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-017-9732-z · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., & Prodinger, B.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-03-17
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 574-583
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2325492974
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 55.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
- The paper
- Cieza, A., Fayed, N., Bickenbach, J., & Prodinger, B. (2019). Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.